Search for: "In Re CAL" Results 561 - 580 of 5,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2025, 2:34 pm
Stealing a cell phone from one person at the shopping mall at 2:30 p.m. is a different offense than punching someone 5:00 p.m. at that same shopping mall and stealing their cell phone as well. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 12:52 pm
The first line of this opinion says:"The juvenile court committed L.H. to a secure youth treatment facility after he pled no contest to committing first degree murder. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:04 pm
"It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 26, 2023, be modified as follows:On page 11, in lines 5 and 6 of footnote 4, delete the phrase “Tak Chun distastefully implies” and replace it with the phrase “Tak Chun’s comparison could be read to distastefully imply” so the full footnote reads as follows:Tak Chun’s comparison to our Supreme Court’s decision in In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757 is ill conceived,… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
If you kill two on-duty police officers, you're going to be sentenced to death. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 10:04 pm by Walter Olson
If you’re a victim of such an action, you still might get lucky and collect from the client who instigated it. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:44 am by Michael
Now we know what happened to Mike Gravel's media team: they're working for Cal Sen candidate Carly Fiorina. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  I'm sure everyone recalls the Supreme Court's landmark opinion in this case from 2009, In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal.4th 298 (2009) (discussed here). [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:15 pm
 Even in the usual case.If you're an attorney, it's often worse. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 1:47 pm
If you're a shrink who's nailing one of your patients, make sure that you keep your paramour happy.Because it's incredibly hard to prove that you're engaging in misconduct if s/he doesn't help. [read post]