Search for: "In Re Jennings"
Results 561 - 580
of 921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 9:03 am
The workers take a strike vote, and they’re encouraged by the union to vote in favour of a strike to send a strong signal to the employer. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
Steve Vladeck and Jen Daskal wrote over at Just Security, too. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 11:22 am
Gay Clark Jennings, President of the House of Deputies. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:43 am
’ And I said, ‘But you’re taking all of our money! [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:01 am
Res. 507. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:04 am
Channeling freedom of the press icon John Peter Zenger, she went on to say: "To clarify, I make no apologies for the following re-post. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:02 am
The liens were re-recorded two and three times in order to add property descriptions to them. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 8:55 pm
(And, if you think about it, the access to the chocolate chip granola bars means that it’s like we’re paying you to come . . .) [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:24 pm
Jens David Ohlin (Cornell Univ. - Law), Elies van Sliedregt (VU Univ. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:09 am
” We might find out the answer today if we’re lucky. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 11:05 am
And, as Jen and Steve mentioned yesterday, Rep. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 10:51 am
How does constitutionalism transform the ‘international’, and (re)produce the ‘political’ and the ‘legal’ as separate realms or social practices? [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm
And in the case of genetic research, for all the reasons that Jen and Madeleine eloquently articulate, we need genomic data to be wedded to rich phenotypic and environmental data. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:01 pm
Jefferson (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), Cullen Jennings, Susan Landau (privacyink.org), Navroop Mitter, Peter G. [read post]
15 May 2013, 3:15 am
The paper is a more comprehensive effort to explain our view re: why proposals for an expanded, open-ended AUMF, from whatever quarter and with whatever caveats, are unneccessary, counterproductive, and unwise. [read post]
7 May 2013, 11:33 pm
Jen and I replied, seeking to sharpen the points of agreement (e.g., greater transparency with regard to who and where we’re fighting) and disagreement, and stressing that, even if extra-AUMF threats justify a new use-of-force authorization, the (in our view) better way to handle such threats is on a retail, rather than wholesale, basis. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:48 am
LaFollette, frequently assailed its decisions and advocated a measure to permit Congress to re-enact by a two-thirds vote any law that the Court had nullified. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 3:50 am
Solum and Tun-Jen Chiang embarked on a mission to provide a new, original approach to the matter, which is presented in 'The Interpretation-Construction Distinction in Patent Law', a 73-page long article for the Yale Law Journal. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:56 am
For the reasons we state in the paper, we agree that Steve and Jen’s approach is feasible, we think it’s more problematic than ours. [read post]
