Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 5:18 am
Jay Michaelson at the Daily Beast questions why we’re all so focused on the wrongs committed by police while ignoring prosecutors gone wild. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 5:05 am
You're not ready for that now. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Kerr gave a separate judgment, disagreeing with the majority’s approach to the legality test and its application of the proportionality test. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a good ruling out of the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:21 am
(Click on image to enlarge) Among cases actually decided in 2011, the top 10 looks like this: Indalex Limited (Re), 2011 ONCA 265 Kerr v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
The police rely on those databases for that purpose, and they're usually pretty accurate for it. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:26 pm
But at least these arguments are sound in traditional exigent circumstances analysis, so they’re pretty fact-bound points. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
We see these provisions occasionally in federal criminal law, but experience with them suggests that they're misguided. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:45 am
., In re Grand Jury, 670 F.3d at 1346; United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:35 am
You’re probably thinking that there must be a lot of caselaw on this. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
If you're no longer tied to what data is protected under the search rules, what else is there to trigger enough of a Fourth Amendment interest? [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 10:18 am
And Orin Kerr discussed four considerations to supplement his amicus brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
In Re McCaughey & Anor [2011] UKSC 20 the Supreme Court, Lord Rodger dissenting, accepted the applicability of the Human Rights Act 1998 to the operation of inquests into pre-Human Rights Act killings. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
In light of those posts, I should point out that Judge Facciola has recently suggested that he may adopt — or, in his case, re-adopt, after being previously reversed for adopting — the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment for historical cell-site records. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:45 am
We're trying to keep the book the same length, and maybe shorten it if we can. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
If you’re abroad, Microsoft might decide to place your e-mail on a server abroad to make it quicker for you to access your e-mail. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:27 am
Over at Prawfs, Richard Re has a post on Kansas v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:27 pm
From Q&A posted earlier this year: Querying databases containing Section 702 information does not result in any new acquisition of data; it is instead only an examination or re-examination of previously acquired information. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 12:37 am
It's in support of a wonderful cause, they're all thinking. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:28 pm
And as it happens, they're not the kinds of cases that tend to get labeled "courageous" anyway. [read post]
