Search for: "In Re Kerr" Results 561 - 580 of 1,243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2014, 4:09 am by SHG
Update:  WaPo Conspirator Orin Kerr has chosen to jump into this mess. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:41 pm
  It can say here’s ­­ here’s how long you’re allowed to keep the information, here’s who’s allowed to look at it and who’s not. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
In light of those posts, I should point out that Judge Facciola has recently suggested that he may adopt — or, in his case, re-adopt, after being previously reversed for adopting — the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment for historical cell-site records. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:22 am
’ Orin Kerr, 4th Amendment Seizures of Computer Data,119 Yale L.J. 700 (2010). [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 7:47 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
The norm is that they’re generalist Justices. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 7:43 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
The norm is that they’re generalist Justices. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:05 am
As I see it, we’re seeing a return to the period before the boom decade of about 1999-2009. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:43 am by SHG
The problem here is that we’re talking about a warrant to seize emails. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 9:16 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
The norm is that they’re generalist Justices. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 pm by Fabrizio di Piazza
The norm is that they’re generalist Justices. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:18 pm by Fabrizio di Piazza
The norm is that they’re generalist Justices. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm by Fabrizio di Piazza
The norm is that they’re generalist Justices. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 10:32 pm
” And not wanting to be left out of the rebranding game, I re-relabeled the debate as a choice between “judicial arrogance” and “judicial awareness. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
This is my second post on recent decisions in computer search and seizure law by Magistrate Judge John Facciola of the federal court in the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
Thanks to activist Noah Newkirk, we’ve recently been reminded that federal law makes it a crime to “make a harangue or oration, or utter loud, threatening, or abusive language in the Supreme Court Building or grounds” (at least if you’re not a justice or a litigant). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am by Laura Sandwell
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Re an application by Central Craigavon Ltd for Judicial Review, heard 15 May 2013. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 12:41 pm
 (Co-Conspirator Orin Kerr occasionally posts at Lawfare; for my own part, when not blogging here at Volokh Conspiracy, I am otherwise known as His Serenity, Book Reviews Editor of Lawfare.) [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:02 am by Orin Kerr
If the President and the FISC are having trouble locating them, they’re in the big building with the dome near the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:54 pm by Orin Kerr
And if they’re not in general public use now, when will they be? [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm by Joe Patrice
As Orin Kerr noted on Lat’s Facebook page, “I am looking forward to the Forbes ‘Top 10 Lawyers Under 10. [read post]