Search for: "In Re Marriage of Will" Results 561 - 580 of 10,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 3:32 pm by William Baude, guest-blogging
” You get a marriage license from the state where you’re getting married, not the federal government, and the state determines who can officiate, how old you have to be, whether you have adequately terminated any previous marriages you had, and so on. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:23 am by Ruth Levush
The significance of this decision is in the Supreme Court’s prevention of the re-opening of a case by the Rabbinical Court of Appeals that might have re-subjected the petitioner to an endless marriage as agunah with all the consequences associated with this status. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 12:34 pm
The bottom line is that we're not willing to apply choice of law analysis here, because we can't tolerate federalism with respect to slavery. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:39 am
You can find the unpublished appellate decision of In Re Marriage of [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 1:22 pm
07/04/09 The Star Phoenix (Gay Marriage Watch):The government of Canada's Saskatchewa province has proposed legislation that would confer exemption on marriage counselors who refuse to perform same-sex marriages for religious reasons. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:53 am by Bonnie Shucha
I believe that applying the well-established (and recently re-energized) principles of Islamic partnership law to Muslim marriage contracts would have several advantages over the current sales-based framework, including eliminating several traditional rules that have been harmful to women. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:12 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
See In re Estate of Hollett, 834 A.2d 348, 353 (N.H. 2003) (declining to consider “the wife's delay in challenging the agreement as substantive evidence of the agreement's voluntariness or ratification”); In re Flannery's Estate, 173 A. 303, 304 (Pa. 1934) (holding that laches did not bar a wife from challenging the prenuptial agreement during marriage and noting that in litigation between spouses “presumptions or estoppels by lapse of time, ordinarily,… [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:06 pm
"Somebody working for one of the justices, or one of the justices, is already at a point where they're deeply into the briefing and starting to think about the issues. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 10:58 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Rare is the couple that marries, divorces, re-marries, gets divorced again, then re-marries for the third time. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:37 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
“We’re pleased that the SJC decided that spouses in civil unions are bound by the same rules as spouses in a marriage when it comes to dissolving legal relationships before entering into a new legal relationship with a different person. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:28 pm by Larry Ribstein
And while we’re talking about e-marriage, how about e-abortion: [T]elemedicine abortions. . . allow women to go to a branch clinic to consult via Internet videoconferencing with a physician located miles away. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 12:33 pm by Richard
I suppose that Martin's re-marriage and becoming a father for the first time, at age 67, illustrates that, frequently, people can go through divorces and still find happiness the second time around! [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by J. Benjamin Stevens
If you’re trying to protect your credit, you may want to take care of the debt and let your ex reimburse you so you know an unpaid bill won't end up bringing down your credit score, Hofheimer says. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:58 pm
Well, now, that's unusual.You're used to seeing child molestation cases in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:47 am
Property which was clearly non-marital at the time of the marriage can be converted into marital property primarily by the following methods: 1) re-titling of non-marital property or 2) commingling non-marital property with marital property. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:45 pm by Gary D. Sparks
Trust me, if you're coming to me down the road, it most certainly was because your marriage was "for worse. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 1:06 pm
UPDATE: Having (very quickly) skimmed the opinion, it seems the Court is allowing that civil unions might be good enough, so long as they're comparable to marriage in terms of benefits, but it seems to leave open the possibility that only marriage that's called marriage might be good enough. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 11:39 pm
Both parents are in therapy to decide whether their marriage can or should be saved and one parent is staying at a friend's house to give them some space to think.In the meantime, what about the kids? [read post]