Search for: "In Re United Light & Power Co."
Results 561 - 580
of 811
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2012, 10:01 pm
Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
As Justice Kagan pressed Paul Clement, "it seems as though you're just talking about a matter of timing . . . . [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
Yeah, like you’re not.) [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
In this respect, the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs has taken steps to reprint the Constitution in light of the decision of the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:52 pm
First, because it may create animosity and hatred against me in both the country I have come to love, the country where I may eventually spend the rest of my life, a The People’s Republic of China, as well as in the country where I and my family now live, the United States of America. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:16 pm
More on those powers in a sec. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm
On January 17, the Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am
Benjamin Foster Co., 739 F. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am
United Kingdom (E. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
This piece was originally posted on the United Kingdom Constitutional Law Group Blog, and is reposted here with thanks. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:15 am
Seriously, we're going to break the Internet because of The Pirate Bay? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
” David Cole worries, however, that perhaps section 1021 will be seen as authorizing detention of individuals–particularly those determined to have “substantially supported” al Qaeda, the Taliban, or their co-belligerent forces–in circumstances inconsistent with longstanding law-of-war principles. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
” David Cole worries, however, that perhaps section 1021 will be seen as authorizing detention of individuals–particularly those determined to have “substantially supported” al Qaeda, the Taliban, or their co-belligerent forces–in circumstances inconsistent with longstanding law-of-war principles. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:14 am
Although the two provisions contain different language, they have the same meaning and are co-extensive in application. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
The current Court majority has used its power to protect companies from big litigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:46 pm
We're one people. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
Why, hat’s a darn fine question with which few in positions of power seem to be concerned. [read post]
