Search for: "In re Marks" Results 561 - 580 of 29,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2015, 2:43 am
In re Graystone Consulting Associates, Inc., Serial No. 85913509 (May 12, 2015) [not precedential].click on image for larger pictureExamining Attorney W. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tam the exclusive right to use this mark in commerce? [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:31 am by John L. Welch
The Board discharged the show cause order, finding that Vital had not lost interest in the case, but it refused to re-open the testimony periods. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:38 pm by Ted Frank
Paging Lester Brickman: Kelly McKiernan and Mark Pellegrin were drinking after work at Pellegrin's home; McKiernan went to leave in his company truck; Pellegrin tried to stop him, and was grievously injured when McKiernan ran him over. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 3:32 am
In re Plasencia 1865, LLC, Serial No. 87147187 (January 9, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen Kuhlke). [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:29 am
In re Donald Dudley, Serial No. 87655327 (October 4, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 3:49 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the mark ADRENALIN ATTRACTIONS for "amusement part rides" [ATTRACTIONS disclaimed] in view of the registered mark ADRENALIM for "amusement park rides and water park rides"].In re Primary Investments Grp. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:24 pm by Jason Rantanen
  Stauffer is a patent attorney who purchased some of the marked bow ties. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am by Bill Heinze
Bravo Co., 64 USPQ2d 1597, 1603 (TTAB 2002); see also, In re Rath, 402 F.3d 1207, 74 USPQ2d 1174, 1175 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:12 pm
If you're in jail, and I'm your attorney, please do not send things to me in envelope marked "Legal Mail" if they have previously been up your butt. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:21 am
In re Alessandra Suuberg, Serial No. 88234650 (December 10, 2021) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas). [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 6:00 am by Dave Rein
Some have argued that after In re Bose, the only penalty for getting caught listing goods or services that are never used with the mark is to correct the registration because: 1) it is difficult to prove fraud and 2) it will be difficult to justify the cost of pursuing fraud claims given the limited relief that  the Board can award. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 4:26 am
" In re Forney Industries, Inc., Appeal No. 20191-1073 (April 8, 2020) [precedential].Forney sought to register a mark comprising the colors "red into yellow with a black banner located near the top as applied to packaging" for metal hardware, welding equipment, safety goods and marking products. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:45 am by George Basharis
Despite minor distinctions in spelling and pronunciation between the proposed mark and the previously registered mark ARTESANO NEW YORK CITY, for similar goods, the overall commercial impression of both marks was that of clothing made by skilled tradespersons in New York. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 3:53 am
In re Truth Partners LLC, dba Mid State Fabricating, Serial No. 88944166 (March 29, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances S. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:50 pm by Robert Scott Lawrence
You’re still together for your golden anniversary and looking forward to platinum.You buy your dream house, and keep it forever. [read post]