Search for: "In the Matter of Cox" Results 561 - 580 of 1,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
This doesn’t matter if it’s done pre- or post-upload—whenever they make choices, they need to accept responsibility for infringing content. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
(triang. setoff) among multiple affiliates outside of BK not enforceable in BK. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/LehmanBrosInc-BK-SDNY-10-4-11-Peck.pdf … B-NY: Stern inapplic. despite fact that dfdt's concession that matter was core occurred well before Stern was decided. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Citron-BK-EDNY-Rosenthal-10-6-11.pdf … B-CA analyzes what Stern held & didnt hold, concluding its narrow &… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:05 pm by Sean Hanover
Because you reasonably relied on a government actor, who had a authority to advise you on this matter, and it was the government actor that was wrong, and not you. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 10:10 am by James Hamilton
Both parties get what they want, noted the law professors, the SEC has an opportunity to promote its success and Citigroup can put the matter behind it and treat the settlement as a cost of doing business. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of B (A child), heard 8-9 December 2015. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the matter of B (A child), heard 8-9 December 2015. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the matter of AR (Children) (Scotland), heard 13 May 2015. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In the matter of AR (Children) (Scotland), heard 13 May 2015. [read post]
  Formalities are now being completed to send the bill to Governor Spencer Cox for signature. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 1:33 am
  While other Commissioners voted in favor of only one proposal, Chairman Cox voted in favor of both, meaning both competing proposals were approved by the required majority.As background, the SEC’s proxy rules require public companies to include in their own proxy materials certain proposals that qualifying shareholders could bring under state law before an annual or special meeting. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:56 am by Zachary Spilman
In rebuttal, the government’s counsel returned to the argument that an accused must lay out a prima facie defense in order to create a matter in substantial conflict with a plea. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am by Laura Sandwell
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria), heard 20 – 21 January 2014. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:49 am by Geoffrey Manne
That market includes such insignificant competitors as Time Warner, Comcast and Cox. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am by Laura Sandwell
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria), heard 20 – 21 January 2014. [read post]