Search for: "In the Matter of Estate of Miller"
Results 561 - 580
of 890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
I recently analyzed proposed legislation (SB 122) seeking to create an alternative procedure for preparation of the CEQA administrative record concurrently with administrative proceedings on a project and prior to any litigation challenging it. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
An example of the assertion of a Medicaid claim appeared in the recent case of Matter of Miller. [read post]
Latest Proposed CEQA Legislation (SB 122) Seeks To Reform Administrative Record Process – At A Price
22 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm
California Senate Bill No. 122 (SB 122), introduced by Senators Jackson, Hill and Roth on January 15, 2015, appears to be the newest stab at legislative CEQA “reform. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:16 am
Kyle’s estate suggested that the Jury got it wrong, and that the court should disregard the jury verdict and issue a “Judgment as a Matter of Law. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:43 am
Cynthia Miller, unit director and counsel (PPL), Deborah Petch, claims counsel (PPL), and Pauline Sheps, claims counsel specialist (PPL) review the kinds of communication errors we see in wills, estates and trusts practice. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
Dowd’s first case in New York County Surrogate’s Court was Matter of Doris Duke, a dispute over the estate of the American Tobacco heiress. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 2:28 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
In a decision filed December 2, and later ordered published on December 30, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Mendocino County Superior Court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging a Nonindustrial Timber Management Plan (NTMP) for 615 acres adjacent to Gualala. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
“And all this science, I don’t understand It’s just my job, five days a week” – Elton John/Bernard Taupin, “Rocket Man” Having seen years of their lofty regional planning efforts come crashing back to Earth, San Diego government entities have had little to be thankful about so far this holiday season on the CEQA front. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm
In a 2-1 published opinion filed November 24, 2014, the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division 1, affirmed and modified the trial court’s judgment granting writ petitions by plaintiff groups challenging the EIR for the San Diego Association of Governments’ (SANDAG) 2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2050 RTP/SCS). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:15 am
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:16 am
Miller; and John A. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:48 am
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:43 am
As a result, the body of case law pertaining to such matters is constantly growing and evolving. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:33 pm
” Further, according to the Court, no case law supported the DWR’s definition of “objection” to exclude questions, and “a comment that raises questions about whether a proposed project will in fact solve the problem it is supposed to remedy is fairly understood as an expression of disapproval, no matter whether phrased as a declarative sentence or a question. [read post]
