Search for: "J Does" Results 561 - 580 of 28,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
However, in the present case this conclusion is only correct with regard to a decision to correct the grant decision pursuant to R 89, since such a decision does not involve a substantive amendment to the decision. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Kevin Smith and Lindsay Colvin
Gomez, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), at 1. [3] Id. at 26 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [4] Id. at 1. [5] Id. at 4. [6] Id. at 6-7. [7] Id. at 7-8. [8] Id. at 12. [9] Id. at 33 (Alito, J., dissenting). [10] Id. at 23 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [11] Id. at 31 (Roberts, J., dissenting). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:10 am by Docket Navigator
First Quality Products Inc., et. al., 1-09-cv-01685 (PAMD November 13, 2013, Order) (Caldwell, J.) [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:11 am by Docket Navigator
Makhteshim Agan of North America, Inc., et al, 1-13-cv-00422 (NCMD July 27, 2015, Order) (Osteen, J.) [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
-The court also found that the Plaintiff's Jane/John Doe averments in the Complaint satisfied the requirements of Pa.R.C.P. 2005 in order to properly designate an unknown defendant by a Doe designation.As such, all of the Defendants Preliminary Objections were overruled.Anyone wishing to review this Opinion may click this LINK. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
No priority...In the present case, the appellant appealed against the decision of the Receiving Section by which the application was deemed not enjoy the right of priority since it was filed after expiry of the 12 month priority period, and by which the request to allow the applicant to submit a new request for restoration of priority was refused. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
No priority...In the present case, the appellant appealed against the decision of the Receiving Section by which the application was deemed not enjoy the right of priority since it was filed after expiry of the 12 month priority period, and by which the request to allow the applicant to submit a new request for restoration of priority was refused. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:29 am
From Think Progress:  Gonzales And Ashcroft Disagree With Rice: Just Because A President Says It Does Not Make It Legal- Garry J. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:00 am by mes286
Sakena Yacoobi, CEO, Afghan Institute of Learning, presents today the J. [read post]
2 May 2009, 11:23 am
It does not yet appear on the CLC's website: President Obama's FEC Pick is Not the "Change We Need": Statement of J. [read post]