Search for: "J. C. SMITH"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
John David Smith, J. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
Most proxy access bylaws address, in some form, the following issues: (a) ownership threshold, (b) length of ownership, (c) maximum number of stockholder nominated candidates, (d) calculation of qualifying ownership, including treatment of “loaned” shares, (e) stockholder group limit, (f) maximum number of access nominees, (g) notice deadlines, (h) future disqualification of stockholder nominees, (i) voting commitments, and (j) third-party compensation… [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm
To read more about the EU Safe Harbor ruling and the upcoming webinar, read Reed Smith attorneys Douglas J. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm
To read more about the EU Safe Harbor ruling and the upcoming webinar, read Reed Smith attorneys Douglas J. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 11:50 am
Walker, Jr., Fort Smith, ARAlex B. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:33 am
Smith, Sanctions, Uncertainty, and Leader Tenure Rachel L. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am
A Bench of Justices Dipak Misra and Prafulla C. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
Smith, 370 F. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 10:21 am
J. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:02 am
J. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
The Report finds that the terms of such guidelines “have clearly become more numerous, lengthy, and sophisticated in detail”, echoing findings in a previous study by Christopher J. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:01 am
Charlotte DWI and Criminal Defense Attorney J. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:30 pm
Special guests include Angela C. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
Kizirian of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 8:03 pm
Lisa Margaret Smith, U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:11 pm
Gerhardt, Chapel Hill – Professor, University of North Carolina School of Law Ralf C. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
On 22 October 2015 there will be an application in the case of Barnes v Smith & ors. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
Smith. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
Smith (1990) has held that the Free Exercise Clause generally doesn’t mandate religious exemptions from generally applicable laws, it can be read as allowing such strict scrutiny in cases involving hybrid rights claims, such as free exercise plus parental rights, or, in this instance, free exercise plus the Second Amendment. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:57 am
Heasley and Cynthia C. [read post]
