Search for: "JENNINGS v. JENNINGS" Results 561 - 580 of 1,206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” Last Wednesday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:22 am by David Gans
  Last Term, the Supreme Court had two major immigration cases on its docket—Jennings v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:44 am by Brian Shiffrin
 However, if the warrant turns out to be invalid or vacated . . . [,] or nonexistent . . . , any evidence seized as a result of the arrest will be suppressed notwithstanding the reasonableness of the arresting officer's reliance upon the communication" (emphasis added)  (People v Lee, 126 AD2d 568, 569,  [2d Dept 1987]; see People v Jennings, 54 NY2d 518,[1981]; People v Lent, 92 AD2d 941, 941,  [2d Dept 1983]). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:15 pm
  Before we get to the next round of litigation in the fashion v freedom dispute of Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner (here), we have had to await the outcome of Nadia Plesner v Judge Hensen. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 7:04 pm
Voter ID laws remain very much in the news, with a divided Seventh Circuit having issued this opinion upholding Indiana's ID requirement in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ImmigrationProf Blog, Denise Gilman looks at one of the cases, Jennings v. [read post]
Jens Adolphsen, Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Nationales und Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht und Sportrecht€ 199 Patents as an Incentive for Innovation by Rafal Sikorski, Zaneta Zemla-Pacud€ 136 [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 3:40 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Video below: Thousands take part in LGBTQ+ Pride march in Jerusalem Since Roe v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:23 am
Jennings, 333 N.C. 579, 430 S.E.2d 188, 199-200 (N.C. 1993) (no error where defendant's counsel, not prosecutor, elicited testimony that defendant exercised his right to remain silent); Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Dimaya, which asks whether a criminal-removal provision of the immigration laws is unconstitutionally vague; and Jennings v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:31 am
Jennings, 489 F.3d 499, 509 (2d Cir. 2007) (citations omitted). [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Adam Chandler
” Also, at PrawfsBlawg, Tun-Jen Chiang has a post on the “unanswered questions” left in the wake of the Court’s recent four-to-four split in the copyright case Costco v. [read post]