Search for: "JOHN BARRETT"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 12:59 pm
After Kimberly told Barrett that she was correct, Kagan picked up the thread a few minutes later. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:40 pm
Justice Barrett similarly worried that a win for Texas would create a loophole for states to evade judicial review of laws threatening constitutional rights. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 6:40 pm
” John Kruzel of The Hill reports that “Supreme Court signals skepticism over Texas’s six-week abortion ban. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 pm
Hearron should have said:Your honor, under the Blackstonian maxim for every right a remedy, invoked by John Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 5:09 pm
Supreme Court yesterday, by a vote of 6-3, in John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:18 pm
In John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
John Does 1-3 v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
Four justices dissented from the decision, including Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
In April 2021, the court – now with a 6-3 conservative majority after the addition of Justice Amy Coney Barrett – did just that when it agreed to hear New York State Rifle & Pistol. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am
In dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts described S.B. 8 as “unprecedented. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
Only four of the nine who served that term remain: Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito Jr. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 6:20 pm
” Tyler Olson and Bill Mears of Fox News have reports headlined “Boston bomber: Barrett asks DOJ lawyer why Biden admin wants to reinstate death sentence amid execution pause; Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked, ‘What’s the government’s end game here? [read post]
Centaurs, Jean Valjean, and a proposed three-sentence ruling on the meaning of favorable termination
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm
Clark’s arguments Clark’s attorney, John Moore, argued that the U.S. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 12:32 pm
Justice Amy Coney Barrett echoed this idea. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:01 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts sought to clarify whether Hemphill sufficiently waived or forfeited the right of confrontation. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am
But Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Kagan too jumped in and emphasized that the information he was seeking was only relevant to show torture that happened in Poland, as did Justice Samuel Alito at a later time in the argum [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
” Chief Justice John Roberts explored the idea that the contractors could be allowed to testify as long as they did not discuss the location at which events occurred – and therefore did not confirm that a particular dark site was located in Poland. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:43 am
Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked whether there was something special about groundwater that justified treating it differently, while Kagan, in turn, questioned Tennessee about the possibility that some aquifers might in fact be truly intrastate. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:32 pm
Alas, Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett let Arlene's Flowers wilt. [read post]
