Search for: "Jacobs v. Marks"
Results 561 - 569
of 569
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
The main course is a double-headed talk by Lord Justice Jacob (who needs neither introduction nor explanation) and Mark Bezant (LECG) on "Remedies or Headaches? [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 1:24 am
Knives out for hindsightIn Ferag AG v Muller Martini Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 15, here on BAILII, the Court of Appeal for England and Wales gave its ruling yesterday on a tricky question relating to hindsight when viewing the prior art. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
.
A2190
Bacalles -- Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided by the county or city of New York to such non-indigent prisoners while in prisonSUMM : Amd SS500-h, 500-n & 508, Cor L Requires non-indigent prisoners to bear the cost of medical care provided to them by the county or city of New York while such non-indigent prisoners are in prison. 01/16/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSA2228
Lafayette (MS) -- Provides for the… [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 3:55 pm
Court of Appeal sides with Mr MicawberThe Court of Appeal today in Roche Products Ltd v Kent Pharmaceuticals Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1775 (noted here on BAILII) affirmed the decision of Mr Justice Lewison that the placing of a "CE" mark on goods, to indicate that they conform with European manufacturing standards, is not evidence of the unequivocal consent of their maker to the resale of those goods in the European Union.In his earlier post on the trial decision (read it… [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 8:10 am
What not to do: Hershey v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:10 am
STOP PRESS: the report of the case discussed below is now available here on BAILIIBubbles go to Europe At 10am this morning the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lords Justices Mummery and Jacob, plus Sir Christopher Staughton)handed down its keenly-awaited decision in O2 Holdings v Hutchison 3G [2006] EWCA Civ 1656. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 4:32 am
The appliance of science - lay advisers go to courtRight: unlike judges, cats spend up to 18 hours a day asleep ...Last Friday the Court of Appeal sneaked this decision out in Halliburton Energy Services Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd [2006] EWCA 1599. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:49 pm
The application was published in 1996, and Remington opposed it under ss.3(1)(a) and (b), 3(2) and 3(3).Once Jacob J found the mark to be invalid, Remington argued that for Philips to continue to resist the opposition on the 3D mark was res judicata, and hence an abuse of process. [read post]
