Search for: "Jane Does 1 - 2"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,008
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
Under the legal standard, "the permissibility of fees charged for the use of state facilities is evaluated under three prongs, which ask whether the fee (1) is based on some fair approximation of use of the facilities, (2) is not excessive in relation to the benefits conferred, and (3) does not discriminate against interstate commerce. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
But where does it come from? [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
Specifically, President Obama maintained that Palestine does not yet constitute a state, and thus cannot accede to the Rome Treaty. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Alan Dershowitz filed a motion to intervene in the victims rights lawsuit of Jane Does 1, 2 and 3 today. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:30 am
For greater certainty, Articles X.2 and X.3 do not apply to any obligation, commitment, undertaking, or requirement other than those set out in those articles. 2. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
Legal costs:A.1 Stikeman Elliott LLP $ 123,580.98A.2 Christian Tacit $ 54,240.00B. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:13 am
Subsequently, the employer filed suit in state court against two building residents, Internet service providers, 20 anonymous John and Jane Does, and three former employees. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
My former law partner and long-time spouse Jane Coleman does. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:22 am
Research explored why firms made decisions to invest in development of public domain projects, finding 4 main rationales: 1) engagement with fan community of existing literary work, 2) use of public domain material to complement a technological platform or subscription service; 3) a conscious entrepreneurial strategy based on identification of existing demand and 4) partnership with a public institution to celebrate and engage the public about an event or anniversary of… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:31 pm
The latest event came last week when Mattel's motion to dismiss MGA's $ 1 billion trade secrets claim was denied by a Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
Stevenson's motion for summary judgment was granted as to Count 1, breach of the Non-Compete Provision, and Count 2, breach of the Non-Solicitation Provision. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:43 am
Non-tax consequences: See #2 immediately above. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:10 pm
Plaintiffs Jane Roe 1, Jane Roe 2 and others similarly situated may discontinue their employment, may choose to work elsewhere, or may choose not to renew their licenses for fear of having their personal information disclosed…. 27. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Jane Doe appeals.Doe No. 14 v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:43 am
With a late July 8-K filing VPOR did lower its authorized shares to 1 billion, from a previous 2 billion, which is some indication that the company is trying to deal with the situation and does not intend to dilute to kingdom come. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:43 am
With a late July 8-K filing VPOR did lower its authorized shares to 1 billion, from a previous 2 billion, which is some indication that the company is trying to deal with the situation and does not intend to dilute to kingdom come. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:36 am
The Ninth Circuit framed the issue as “whether the CDA bars Jane Doe’s negligent failure to warn claim under California law” and began by looking at the text of the CDA, specifically sections 230(c)(1) and (2). [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:46 pm
Co-Mediation: Drawbacks 1. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
Jane already flagged the merits brief filed by the U.S. government on September 17 in al Bahlul v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 8:08 am
Such a conclusion, however, is contrary to the plain language of Article XXXIII, which expressly lays out the County's dual pre-transfer obligations to the Union: (1) attempted placement of employees and (2) at least thirty days' notice. [read post]
