Search for: "Jay v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 1,570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” Speaking at a conference in Washington a few days later, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton reinforced the Cyber Unit’s ICO mission and jurisdiction, noting that: “ . . . [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Daily Podcast, Jay Schweikert discusses Collins v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 24 November 2017 Jay J handed down judgment in the case of Serafin v Malkiewicz [2017] EWHC 2992 (QB) (heard 30-31 October and 1-3 and 6-9 November 2017). [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Jay Schweikert discusses Collins v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  Last Week in the Courts The trial in Serafin v Malkiewicz began on 30 October 2017 before Jay J and continues next week. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
United States It is reported that former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly on Friday filed a defamation claim against former New Jersey state legislator Michael Panter, following a Facebook post on Tuesday in which Panter detailed alleged sexual harassment by O’Reilly against an unnamed ex-partner of Panter’s. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]