Search for: "John/Jane Doe "
Results 561 - 580
of 1,047
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2014, 8:03 am
Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.213.184.255Cause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
10 May 2014, 11:11 am
The case arose when the plaintiffs, Jane Doe and John Doe, commenced the suit in the Massachusetts Superior Court [official website], challenging the practice by which the pledge is recited each morning in the public schools of the town of Acton and the Acton-Boxborough regional school... [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Absent some other objectively reasonable basis for pulling over John Doe, however, the police officer in this situation may not stop Mr. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 2:58 am
The Lanham Act does not directly address claims of secondary liability. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 12:14 pm
MIKE SMITH, JOHN DOES 1-100, JANE DOES 1-100, XYZ COMPANY, Defendants. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
Aldrich listed all of the assets she owned at the time and stated she wanted those assets to go to her sister Mary Jane Eaton, if she survived here, otherwise to her brother James Michael Aldrich. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:06 am
John Health System, which owns Jane Phillips Medical Center, released a statement clarifying that while the institution itself does not approve or support contraceptive practices, physicians maintain the ability to prescribe medications "in accordance with their independent professional medical judgment." [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
John Doe and Jane Doe, 2014 FC 161, provides insight into the collision of Norwich Orders, means used to identify unknown infringers, and the growing business model of copyright trolls giving rise for the Courts to be more mindful of playing a role in potentially abusive behaviour of the trolls. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm
John decided that he wanted his only son, Jack Doe, to own the property albeit in a life estate form because Jack was largely irresponsible. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:36 pm
Often, when a defendant is unknown, a suit will be brought in the name of Jane or John Doe, and only after discovery will the actual parties be named. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:55 am
The Canadian media featured extensive coverage over the weekend of the federal court decision in Voltage Pictures LLC v John Doe and Jane Doe (2014 FC 161) which, whilst opening the possibility of ISPs being required to disclose the names and addresses of thousands of allegedly infringing subscribers, also establishes new safeguards against copyright trolling in Canada and balanced the interests of copyright owners against the right of privacy. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:41 pm
John Doe and Jane Doe (2014 FC 161) has already received considerable attention for its approach to deterring so-called “copyright trolls”: plaintiffs with “improper motives” who file multitudes of infringement lawsuits to extort quick settlements. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:41 pm
John Doe and Jane Doe (2014 FC 161) has […] [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:41 pm
John Doe and Jane Doe (2014 FC 161) has […] [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:21 pm
So the Idaho Supreme Court concludes in In the Matter of the Adoption of John Doe & John Doe I (Idaho Feb. 10, 2014). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 1:54 pm
Jane Doe, a U.S citizen who was subjected to a strip search, multiple genital and cavity searches, a forced bowel movement, an X-ray, and a CT scan following a false alert by a CBP service canine at an El Paso border crossing. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm
If you do not have a registration certificate, or if you are registering a new vehicle, complete the Official Registration, Form H-13, and designate the Owner in Box 1 as “John Doe, Transfer on Death to Jane Doe. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:50 pm
In the 124-page lawsuit, West’s attorneys accuse 0daycoins.com, coinye-exchange.com, newchg.com, “Jane Does 1 through 50,” “John Does 1 through 50,” “Fnu Lnu a/k/a Jonny Bravo,” Dogecoin, and Amazon of “willful trademark infringement, unfair competition, dilution, and rights of publicity violations among a score of other blatant statutory and common law violations. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 5:58 am
At the same time, Jane updated us on motions in Aamer v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am
John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
