Search for: "John Doe 4"
Results 561 - 580
of 8,706
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2023, 1:20 pm
Yet that "doing" does not always invariably point in the same direction. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:55 pm
In this sense commentary augments collective solidarity through guidance by a vanguard or elite invested with a special relation to text.[3] In its most positive form, it can represent “an organic synthesis of the essential and fundamental contents” of doctrine, written and oral.[4]Yet it can also serve the opposite purpose—to expose and resist orthodoxies deepened through the commentary of groups devoted to the protection of a specific way of approaching text, its… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:59 am
Doe, I would like to direct your attention to an email sent from John Doe to you on March 3, 2023 that has been remarked as Exhibit X. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:02 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
In a 5-4 opinion for the Court by Justice Sotomayor (joined by the other Democratic appointees plus CJ Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh), the Court held that it had the authority to review and then reversed the Arizona Supreme Court's rejection of John Montenegro Cruz's challenge to his death sentence. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 12:01 am
But for what she does include, it should not be missed. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:54 pm
ShareTuesday’s 5-4 ruling in Bittner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
In the hurly burly of work and life, I lost touch with the proceedings in Mann, but recently I became aware of interesting gatekeeping rulings, issued in 2021.[4] I was particularly intrigued by the activity of Naomi Oreskes, qua historian, who sought to offer an expert witness opinion in the Mann case. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
John the Baptist Bishop Monkton [2021] ECC Lee 7. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
The three-judge panel—consisting of Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson, Gregory Katsas, Neomi Rao—heard from counsel for Perry, John Rowley, as well as Justice Department lawyer John Pellettieri. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 3:01 am
By John A. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:19 am
In a 5-4 decision in Cruz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 3:58 am
Joffe’s piece is a very good and very important one and I urge everyone to read it in its entirety because my brief summary does not do it justice. 4. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
”], and § 15168(c)(4) [recommending use of written checklist “to determine whether the environmental effects of [site-specific activities are] within the scope of the program EIR. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
The Department stated: “The United States disagrees with plaintiffs’ unsupported assertion that the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause does not apply to the Vice President in his official capacity as the President of the Senate” (p.4 n. 1 & see also p.6). [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:09 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
What does it mean to maximize utility? [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The LDI has evidence that McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC, and its principals, managers and/or partners William Huye Ill, John Moseley and James McClenny (collectively referred to herein as “MMA”) participated in a fraudulent scheme involving fraudulent insurance acts. 4. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
—John Wooden 1Karsel Holdings v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 9:02 pm
– John Jenkins [read post]
