Search for: "John and Jane Doe(s)" Results 561 - 580 of 987
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 4:50 pm by Cyrus Farivar
In the 124-page lawsuit, West’s attorneys accuse 0daycoins.com, coinye-exchange.com, newchg.com, “Jane Does 1 through 50,” “John Does 1 through 50,” “Fnu Lnu a/k/a Jonny Bravo,” Dogecoin, and Amazon of “willful trademark infringement, unfair competition, dilution, and rights of publicity violations among a score of other blatant statutory and common law violations. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 5:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
At the same time, Jane updated us on motions in Aamer v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am by Ron Coleman
 John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
Ingrid examined why the SG’s argument on the constitutional power of the executive branch is both “expansive and unconvincing,” and John gave some reasons why the brief missed the mark. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:52 am by Jane Chong
Anne Gearan of the Post offers a behind-the-scenes take on the drama that unfolded between Secretary of State John F. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:02 pm by Anita Ramasastry
  Will John or Jane be treated differently if their student file contains lots of evidence of unruly posts? [read post]
Bob does buy John a pizza, and then John does help Bob paint his living room. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Jones filed a complaint as a Jane Doe plaintiff, and at an evidentiary hearing on August 15, 2010, she entered her true name as she filed for a default judgment against “the dirty.com. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
Or that you are not the same John Jackson who skipped town and did not pay his last month’s rent? [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 10:38 am by Ritika Singh
Secretary of State John Kerry also remarked away; here is the full text of his comments at the State Department’s press briefing. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
McDougall had named “John/Jane Doe as a person to be subsequently named” in the caption, the Commissioner said that the record indicates that at the time Ms. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:22 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Johns University, USA (invited) Perry Dane, Rutgers University School of Law, USA, “Endorsement, Legal Reason, and the Misguided Quest for Reasonableness” Javier Martinez-Torron, Complutense University School of Law, Spain, “Institutional Religious Symbols, State Neutrality and Protection of Minorities” Session 2 – Hate speech, hate crimes and religious minorities H. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:06 pm by Howard Knopf
If Voltage thinks is can sue thousands of John and Jane does in one singles lawsuit, it is likely going to be disappointed, given that each case could present different facts and different defences. [read post]
15 May 2013, 3:54 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-23 Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00841-SEB-DKLFile Date:    Monday, June 18, 2012Plaintiff:     Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel:     Paul J. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
 John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:00 am by The Book Review Editor
But one also gets the sense – in talking to officials, and in reading between the lines of various publications, including Mazzetti’s book – that JSOC does unacknowledged (not just clandestine, but unacknowledged) operations outside of Title 50. [read post]