Search for: "Jones v. Doe" Results 561 - 580 of 4,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
  In Jones, the Seventh Circuit - following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. $8,850 - applied the speedy trial test from Barker v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This Court has upheld this penalty numerous times over the years in similar situations (see Matter of Quire v City of New York, 189 AD3d 467, 468 [1st Dept 2020]; Matter of Lumezi v Bratton, 147 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2017]; Matter of Jones v Kelly, 111 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2013]). [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
And how bad does the spin from last week look? [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Docket Navigator
However, '[a]n abstract idea does not become nonabstract by limiting the invention to a particular field of use or technological environment, such as the Internet.'” CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:34 pm
The following entry was written by Jameson Jones, a student in the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:47 am by Dave
HHJ Jones disagreed because: the absence of a written record or contract is serious; English ODPM guidance indicated its importance at least as a matter of good practice in Wales - as HHJ Jones remarked: "How, if at all, does this local authroity monitor good performance by Ms Tyrrell if there is no written framework document of authorisation? [read post]