Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders"
Results 561 - 580
of 739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 2:00 am
As Lord Hoffmann said in the case of R v Jones [2006] UKHL 16, which involved defendants causing various forms of damage to military infrastructure in order to prevent the war in Iraq in 2003: … when Parliament speaks of a person being entitled to use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances, the court must, in judging what is reasonable, take into account the reason why the state claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression 12 v. (1946-1948) Office of United States Chief of Counsel. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am
Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc and others, 17 June 2024 (Steyn J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) MBR Acres v FREE THE [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm
The public defender is not assigned to the case and the individual has not hired a private criminal defense attorney. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
Riley, 14-1472, and Jones v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 am
” State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
" A spot of sparring in the States. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
Trump Mot. to Intervene 3, Texas v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
On 12 December 2012, the Court of Appeal (Arden and Lloyd-Jones LJJ and Tugendhat J) handed down judgment in Cammish v Hughes ([2012] EWCA Civ 1655). [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
West Virginia exempts from state taxation the retirement benefits of former state law-enforcement officers but does not provide the same exemption for the retirement benefits of former employees of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Reserved Judgments Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another, heard 4 December 2023 (Johnson J) Wilson v Mendelsohn [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 8:50 am
The two cases before the court were Godfrey v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Held, there was no evidence of consent to the publications which were the subject of the Claim. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:48 pm
He describes how the firm brought in lots of business-side people, including a CFO, a COO, and marketing and public relations people. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:38 pm
Supreme Court enunciated in Morrison v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
Fairfax media intends to defend the claim, the Sydney Morning Herald Reports. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
Consent Decree (April 4, 2013); Mervin Jones v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
City of Miami Fire Fighters and Police Officers’ Retirement Trust, 17-1056 Issue: Whether, or in what circumstances, a defendant must admit that non-forward-looking statements are false or misleading, in order to be protected by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act safe-harbor provision for forward-looking statements. [read post]
