Search for: "Judicial Review Council" Results 561 - 580 of 4,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
English law, which we are an acknowledged expert in, does not easily  provide for judicial review of the executive. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:52 am by Michael Barber
The decision comes in response to a December 2017 petition for judicial review filed by members of the UK parliament, originally in the Court of Sessions, which was referred to the Court of Justice in October 2018. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:44 am by INFORRM
 A statement from PressBoF, the people behind the discredited Press Complaints Commission, said it was appealing against the judges’ refusal of permission for a judicial review of the Privy Council’s decision to reject its bid for a Royal Charter. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:08 pm by Mark Murakami
  Under federal law, a case is not moot if the controversy is capable of repetition yet evade judicial review. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by David Pocklington
This summary also includes: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; CFCE Determinations; Other legal issues; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:23 pm by Nicole Huberfeld
Virginia is familiar with the critique that Chief Justice Marshall created judicial review out of whole cloth. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 12:59 pm by Howard Knopf
It seems that we have just finished a summer of uncertainty in respect of several cases involving judicial review from the Copyright Board. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Syafari advised people who are against the bylaw to apply for judicial review to the Constitutional Court. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 11:01 am
The judicial decisions and doctrines that govern the field are the subject of torrents of law review articles. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:42 am by Вихър Георгиев
The report on Bulgaria notes that Bulgaria has strengthened the Supreme Judicial Council and improved rules for the appointment, professional training, appraisals and promotions of judges. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 1:37 am by Shaheen Rahman
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts More cuts: Library closure challenge fails – Shaheen Rahman Another cuts challenge fails: Changes to housing benefit scheme is lawful Courts still slow to interfere in spending cuts decisions Council disregards new equality duties in terminating free legal services – Shaheen Rahman Family legal aid tender process was “unfair, unlawful and irrational” A cut out and… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Justice Smith brought judicial review proceedings in Federal Court and has now been successful in having the Review Panel decision quashed. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am by Grace Capel
Lord Phillips relied on the following evidence of state practice which, in his view, pointed toward an agreement that a prosecutor can be an issuing judicial authority: (i) a number of Member States designated prosecutors as issuing judicial authorities; and (ii) this had not been the subject of criticism by other Member States, the Commission or the Council [67-76]. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:13 pm by NL
R (Neville) v London Borough of Wandsworth [2009] EWHC 2405 (Admin) [not on Bailii yet] This was a renewed application for permission for a Judicial Review of Wandsworth's refusal of a discretionary succession. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:13 pm by NL
R (Neville) v London Borough of Wandsworth [2009] EWHC 2405 (Admin) [not on Bailii yet] This was a renewed application for permission for a Judicial Review of Wandsworth's refusal of a discretionary succession. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:15 pm by Ritika Singh
We endorse similar restrictions on the issuance of National Security Letters (by which the Federal Bureau of Investigation now compels individuals and organizations to turn over certain otherwise private records), recommending prior judicial review except in emergencies, where time is of the essence. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:19 am by Frank Cranmer
In Tossici-Bolt & Anor v Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (Amendment Judgment) [2023] EWHC 3230 (Admin), handed down on the same day, the Court refused Christian Concern permission to add an additional ground to the judicial review claim: that the Order had been made without lawful authority because it was not passed according to the Council’s Constitution but, instead, decided upon unilaterally by a single Councillor. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:53 pm by Meg Martin
The Court concluded that the district court could have admitted the EQC as a party after the time for filing the petition for review had passed because there is nothing to suggest otherwise in either the statutes governing administrative actions or the rules governing judicial review of administrative action. [read post]