Search for: "KR"
Results 561 - 580
of 925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2009, 2:27 am
TAKSÄ°M TOPLANTISI KRÄ°ZDEN ETKÄ°LEN FÄ°RMALAR 8 EKÄ°M PERÅžEMBE, SAAT 18.00 DE TAKSÄ°M'DE TOPLANIYOR, TOPLANTI YERÄ° ADRESÄ° SALI GÃœNÃœNDEN Ä°TÄ°BAREN… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:56 am
The Kentucky Whistleblower statute is KRS 61.100 et seq. and requires that suit be filed within 90 days of the retaliatory action occurring. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 5:00 am
KRS 413.241 The only way to completely ensure you won? [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
Frogge 2009-CA-001867-ME AND NO. 2010-CA-000049 Issues: Published: Affirming County: Warren DE FACTO CUSTODIAN AND TOLLING STATUTE: KRS 403.270(1)(a) provides that, in calculating the minimum period of time during which a person must be the sole primary caregiver and financial supporter of a child in order to qualify for de facto custodian status, the requisite period of time shall not include any period of time after a legal proceeding has been commenced by a parent. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:37 am
The newly enacted Senate Bill 139 also demands that in the event that a deed is recorded by a county clerk, that recordation shall constitute adequate notice to third parties of the transfer of the property and shall be admissible as evidence of such transfer even if the instrument is not in compliance with KRS 382.135. [read post]
1 May 2007, 7:26 am
Analysis: While the DRC failed to comply with KRS 454.350(2), both parties were aware of what the DRC's recommendations were going to be. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
It has always been my position in legal malpractice cases that physical injury is not required in a legal malpractice case because of a special Kentucky statute KRS 411.165. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
Kentucky has never addressed the issue; however, I don't think it would allow Larry Lawyer a set-off for his contingent fee because of KRS 411.165. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:44 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503 (24 May 2007) Ford-Camber Ltd. v Deanminster Ltd & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 458 (24 May 2007) Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 501 (24 May 2007) KR (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 514 (24 May 2007) Framlington Group Ltd & Anor v Barnetson [2007] EWCA Civ 502 (24 May 2007) Howard De Walden Estates Ltd & Anor v Les… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:31 am
TC stated that, as a matter of law, that this fact, and this fact alone, precluded a finding of abandonment or failure to provide care or essentials under KRS 199.502 (1), the only possible grounds for termination in this case. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm
The right of a non-parent, other than a de facto custodian, to have standing to petition for custody used to be set forth in KRS 403.420, which was part of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 2:19 pm
Sheldon, 6:07-cv-00839-MSS-KRS, was a federal case from the middle district court. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:45 am
(See KRS 532.060) [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
This suit seeks to recover all amounts wager through these suits, relying on KRS 372.040, which can be found here. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:55 am
The law went into effect on July 15, 2016 and is codified at KRS 403.352. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 12:46 am
KRS 610.010(11). [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:50 am
KRS 403.270(2). [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 3:58 am
For any questions regarding condo associations, please contact DBL Law attorneys Justin Knappick (jknappick@dbllaw.com) or Katherine Simone (ksimone@dbllaw.com). [1] KRS 381.9179. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Such is the argument currently brewing over legal malpractice damages in Texas.Kentucky has never addressed the issue; however, I don't think it would allow Larry Lawyer a set-off for his contingent fee because of KRS 411.165.Hans Poppe [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:27 pm
KRS 342.165 is amended to read as follows: … (6) Following a settlement agreement or an award of income benefits in an original claim, a subsequent settlement of future medical expenses shall not be approved unless the settlement is approved by the federal Medicare Secondary Payer Act. [read post]
