Search for: "Kay v. Kay" Results 561 - 580 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
" Considering the issue of Articles 10 and 11 it was held by the Court that this case was not similar to Kay or Doherty as no balancing act had been carried out during the passing of the legislation. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
" Considering the issue of Articles 10 and 11 it was held by the Court that this case was not similar to Kay or Doherty as no balancing act had been carried out during the passing of the legislation. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:20 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued February 9, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Boyer-Gladden v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has made clear in Connors v UK (2005) 40 EHRR 9 and McCann v UK (19009/04), that each person faced with eviction proceedings should be able to have a court assess the proportionality of the proposed eviction and, whilst the House of Lords haven’t quite gone as far as this yet, in both Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 and Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, they made clear that the approach… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
  In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944  it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Clement v Londa, 8 AD3d 89, 90 [1st Dept 2004); see Kai Lin v Department of Dentistry, Univ. of Rochester Med. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(Ars Technica) Department of Justice notifies judge overseeing Google Book Deal case that it is investigating the deal for potential antitrust violations (IPKat) Statutory damages: Quelling innovation and enabling injustice (Public Knowledge) Sample DMCA takedown letter (IP Watchdog) Debate over Judge Posner’s suggestion of making linking, paraphrasing copyright infringement in order to protect newspapers (The Trademark Blog) (Public Knowledge) Harold Feld on copyright reform proposals to… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:35 am by Adam Wagner
Of course, this may not be that issue and the Supreme Court may just follow Lord Bingham in Kay v Lambeth. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:06 am
Conference on RPM - On December 4, a conference was held in Washington, D.C. on the topic of resale price maintenance ("RPM") by consumer advocates, regulators, and policy experts opposed to RPM.Minimum RPM has emerged as a hot topic in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2007 ruling in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
For these reasons the present case is indistinguishable from authorities such as Kay v Lambeth LBC [2005] QB 352 at paragraphs 107-8 and Austin v Southwark LBC [2010] HLR 1 So, the right to buy did not engage A1P1. [read post]