Search for: "LITTLE v. TERRITORY" Results 561 - 580 of 1,352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:14 am by Beth Van Schaack
For example, in support of his conclusion in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
It said there was little to distinguish the special combat pay from the disability pay in terms of enforcement. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Rob Howse
 Traditional BITs and investor-state arbitration have had little to do with this more sound economic rationale for international law disciplines in the investment area. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
In her view, patent rights were purely territorial, and that "…[b]ecause a sale abroad operates independently of the US patent system, it makes little sense to say that such a sale exhausts an inventor’s US patent rights". [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Even when Trump switched from an explicit ban on Muslims to a territorial focus, he avowed that the new proposal was not a rollback but an “expansion” of the old one. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
Lastly, Wilkinson argued that the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the United States should be given little weight. [read post]