Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle" Results 561 - 580 of 12,159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2011, 1:11 pm
Because the same labeling misrepresentations were made to all class members, the misrepresentations were material and a presumption of reliance should have been applied.The August 9 decision is Gaston v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Pom's petition, with QP: "Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a private party cannot bring a Lanham Act claim challenging a product label regulated under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act." [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:53 am by New York Criminal Defense
Early last week the Court of Appeals reversed a decision of the First Department which held that the rule of law announced in People v Catu applies retroactively to pre-Catu convictions (People v Smith, 132 AD3d 511 [1st Dept 2015]) -- a decision I had labeled a "huge success for the criminal defense bar" in an October blog post.In People v Catu, the New York Court of Appeals held that the court must advise a defendant of the post-release… [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:15 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Genentech asserts that neither Azuma nor the Pirespa® label literally discloses Grade 2 elevated liver enzymes or the claimed continued treatment of patients with pirfenidone. [read post]