Search for: "Lawrence v. Texas"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2008, 7:54 pm
openelementIn brief, all three judges on the panel found the policy to be constitutionally infirm.The plaintiff raised both substantive due process and equal protection claims.The two judges writing in the majority held as follows:(1) Substantive due process claim: The judges concluded that Lawrence v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
Cummings, Is Article 125, Sodomy a Dead Letter in Light of Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 10:14 pm
The Supreme Court increasingly consults such external norms as persuasive authority; most recently, it found support in a European human rights judgment for its conclusion in Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:15 pm
Judge for yourself: The Con Luv Boyz "want you like Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:55 am
The landmark civil rights case of Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:24 pm
The nation’s sexual revolution of the 1960s fueled a social movement of people seeking repeal of sodomy laws, but it was not until the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
Texas and Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Wade and Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:42 am
A majority of the 9th Circuit panel was not so sure, especially in light of Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:13 am
See Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
In Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
Wade was decided incorrectly, and in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:36 pm
’" Here, the court invokes Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 7:24 pm
Texas and Obergefell v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm
Finally, there can be no clearer authority for the death of Section 2(a) than Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am
” At the Santa Fe Reporter, Laura Paskus takes an in-depth look at the issues in Texas v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
Just two months after Senator Santorum made his homosexuality/adultery/bestiality comparison, the Supreme Court vindicated his fears in Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Boxpac et al Utah District Court Filed: March 13, 2008 Plaintiff: Timber Products Inspection, Timber Products Inspection Defendant: Boxpac, Lawrence L. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
The only way the Texas law protects unborn life is by closing clinics, and, under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
