Search for: "Leone v. Leone"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,476
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2007, 8:53 am
In Lambert v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
In an interesting criminal case, United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:34 am
[Post by Venkat] United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:44 am
Leon, 468 U. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 8:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:29 am
Des Moines Independent Community School District, Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 2:26 pm
Circuit’s opinion today in Klayman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:09 am
Even as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit and supporting evidence, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted “with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Fleyshman v Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLC, 91 AD3d 591, 592-593; Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160, 160-161). [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
Leon (1984) 468 U.S. 897, 920–922 [82 L. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 11:01 am
In Balde v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Even as amplified by the plaintiff's affidavit, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted "with intent to deceive the court or any party" (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160, 160-161). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 11:27 pm
Those documents “conclusively establish[] a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:14 am
Leone et al., 2012 ONSC 6237, to little fanfare. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
Wilmoth, 22 Ohio St.3d 251, 490 N.E.2d 1236 (1986) (Ohio formally adopts the Leon good-faith exception.) [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:20 am
" "In Leon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:08 am
” “Here, even accepting the facts alleged in the complaint, as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit, as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87), the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendants’ alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome on his workers’ compensation claim (see Katsoris… [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
Upon construing the complaint liberally, and affording plaintiffs the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), we reject defendants’ contention that the breach of contract cause of action is duplicative of the accounting malpractice cause of action. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
Larry v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:15 am
"Accepting the facts alleged in the second amended complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), the second amended complaint states a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Aranki v Goldman & Assoc., LLP, 34 AD3d 510). [read post]
