Search for: "Locke v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 3,941
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am by Minick Law
” Asking those questions in terms of is it present in the notes or is it not, that locks the officer in to answering the questions the way that you are hoping the officer and anticipating the officer is going to ask. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The much anticipated judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)) was handed down on 2 November 2020. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
I recall being enraptured by Griswold v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am by Derek T. Muller
The dissenting opinion also does not engage the majority opinion’s reliance on a state case called Luse v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:37 pm by tvasil
Michigan: On October 19, Director Fox published Bulletin 2020-41-INS/BT/CF/CU, which supersedes Bulletin 2020-38-INS/BT/CF/CU, stating the following: On October 12, 2020, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order in House of Representatives v Governor, Docket No. 161917, stating that, consistent with the ruling In re Certified Questions and effective immediately, the Executive Orders issued under the Emergency Powers of the Governor Act “are of no continuing legal… [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Elin Hofverberg
The Swedish Constitution (Regeringsformen (RF)) protects fundamental freedoms, as does the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)), to which Sweden is a State Party. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  It challenges New York City's lock down in zip codes in which there are micro-clusters of COVID-19.Amistad Project announced that it filed suit over the weekend in Libertas Classical Ass'n v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am by Keith Mallinson
” Similarly, in Germany in Nokia v Daimler, the Mannheim court stated that the “royalty provided in [Daimler’s] counter-offer is not reasonable, as the reference value used in the top-down approach in the form of the average purchase price of [TCUs] is unsuitable. [read post]