Search for: "Long v. Murphy"
Results 561 - 580
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
Now drinkers can enjoy the IPKat's football prowess via Greek decoders Breathlessly back on the blog after this morning's envigorating copyright and trade mark law training session with a bright and bushy-tailed batch of trainees, this Kat now turns to the main news of the moment, today's momentous ruling of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Murphy 207 NY 240 : 100 NE 742 (1913); City of Rock Springs v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:41 am
See Henderson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
. — Marriage, the traditional kind consisting of “the union for life of one man and one woman,” was described by the Supreme Court more than a century ago in Murphy v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:35 pm
See Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:53 am
The conduct complained of must be "so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community" (Murphy v American Home Prods. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 1:11 pm
In Shiamili v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:49 am
When I’ve blogged about Lochner v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Adams, William Bryan "Bill" v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am
Although the legal premise for such cases arose in the 1980s (see, for example State (O’Connell) v Fawsitt [1986] I.R. 362 and Murphy v DPP [1989] I.L.R.M. 71) real interest in the “missing evidence” concept as a method to seek to force the prohibition of an impending trial did not gather pace until the early 2000s. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
On Monday, we celebrated the 44th anniversary of an important civil rights milestone, the Supreme Court decision in the ACLU case Loving v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm
While for most Americans, Loving v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 6:24 pm
As if the lesson hadn't be learned long ago: It's the coverup that gets you. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:52 am
You’ll long be remembered, whenever we say: “Fair winds and a following sea! [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
The only reason removal is even possible prior to service is due to the advent of electronic case filing and waiver of service rules that could not have been foreseen when the current removal statute was enacted.Id. at *6 (discussing and attempting to analogize to Murphy Brothers, Inc., v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Referee Crespo also bases his rejection of DLOM on case law, including Vick v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:15 pm
” Citing Murphy v American Home Prods. [read post]
