Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 4,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
(JUSTICES: Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Walker, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, and Lord Carnwath) The post Joint Administrators of Heritable Bank plc (Respondent) v The Winding-Up Board of Landsbanki Islands hf (Appellant) (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 13 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The difficultly inherent in the case was reflected by the disagreement between the two patent specialist judges who heard the case, Lord Justices Arnold and Floyd. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
Although Lord Carnwath (in line with the dissenting opinions of Lord Sales and Lady Arden) disagreed with Lord Wilson’s view that the scope of the Guidance is limited to “purely procedural or operational matters”, he stated that this did not open the door to “the delineation of the functions of central government in relation to the fund”. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
First-Tier Tribunal decision The First-Tier Tribunal applied the principals set out in the House of Lords decision in Customs and Excise Commissioners v Redrow Group plc [1999] UKHL 4. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:17 am
Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 may ultimately be best remembered for the language used by Lord Justice Ward in his judgment, rather than for any particular point of law. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
Judgment Lord Neuberger MR delivered the sole judgment. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
” In addressing this issue, Eady J referred to Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109, where the House of Lords had drawn a distinction between state secrets and confidential information relating to an individual’s private life. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:04 am
The stairs were in a state of disrepair. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
The use of prosecution history must support at least one of the two instances identified by Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 2:28 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge stated that no consideration had been given to the possibility of personal protective equipment and the precautions taken, in the form of advice to wear appropriate footwear, did not specify what might be appropriate. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:21 am
This is a particularly difficult area of law, which is governed by the House of Lords’ decision in Lawson v Serco [2006] ICR 250. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am
Giving the joint leading judgment, Lord Neuberger and Lord Reed stated that the VAT for which a defendant has accounted to HMRC is in a different category from either income or corporation tax, and from expenses incurred in connection with acquiring money or an asset. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
” A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Noting that ECHR rights had been incorporated into domestic law, the House of Lords decided that the law breached Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention, even though they took the view that the matter might well be held by Strasbourg to be within the margin of appreciation of member States. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:50 pm
In June 1971 the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Advocate appointed a Committee “to consider whether, in the light of the working of the Defamation Act 1952, any changes are desirable in the law, practice and procedure relating to actions for defamation”. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:32 pm
Plaintiffs also seek an injunction to close the Lord Flat Trail to motorized vehicle use. [read post]
