Search for: "MARK D. LINK" Results 561 - 580 of 4,279
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2009, 9:50 pm
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.October 6, 2009 - 10 AM: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:22 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.May 3, 2012 - 11 AM: In re InterDesign, Inc., Serial No. 77906060 [Refusal to register FRIDGE BINZ! [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 4:37 am
Affirms TTAB: REDSKINS Marks Found Disparaging of Native AmericansSection 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 34: MMMBop! [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 9:44 pm
You'd mistakenly think that the name was available. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:35 am by James Romoser
(Our Curious Amalgam podcast) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:28 am by Amy Howe
” A friendly reminder:  We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:54 am by James Romoser
Wade (Nina Totenberg, NPR) Chief Justice John Roberts Lauds Courts’ Pandemic Response in Year-End Message (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) A Modest Proposal for Supreme Court Reform (Mark Tushnet, Balkinization) Dozens of Native Americans Could Get Out of Prison Because of This Supreme Court Decision (Kathleen Caulderwood & Gabrielle Caplan) In Virus Era, US Supreme Court Filings Fell 16% Year-Over-Year (Mike Scarcella, The National Law Journal) We rely on our readers to… [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion, please send it to roundup@scotusblog.com. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:02 am
[As we have seen in many TTAB decisions, very strong marks (i.e., those "famous" for Section 2(d) purposes) are given broad protection under a likelihood-of-confusion analysis, and the issue of dilution is never reached by the Board.]Jerre B. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
Additional commentary on each case may be found at the linked TTABlog posting]. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:14 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.March 1, 2016 - 11 AM: In re Crocs, Inc., Serial No. 86096875 [Section 2(d) refusal of FIND YOUR FUN for "on-line retail store services featuring footwear, socks, apparel, hospital scrubs, hats and headwear, bags, jewelry, pencil cases, phone and mp3 cases, shoe ornaments, sunglasses and eyewear," in view of the registered mark FIND YOUR FUN! [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 7:25 pm
" He certainly didn't bat very well there To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:45 am by Laura Orr
“ (Link to full post.)Oregon Legal Research blog previous post on Oregon tattoo artists: Tattoos: The Art, Craft, Business, and Oregon Law of Tattoos and Tattoo Artists [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 10:21 am
They all found the article through Brian Leiter (who, as long as I'm at it, also links to some laugh-out-loud videos from the Harvard Econ Department). [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 7:00 am
" ]September 23, 2008 - 11 AM: In re LG Electronics, Inc., Serial No. 78737356 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark BLURADIANCE for "domestic cooking oven ranges; electric cooking ranges; microwave ovens," in view of the registered mark RADIANCE for gas stoves.]September 30, 2008 - 10 AM: Stuart Spector Designs, Ltd., et al. v. [read post]