Search for: "MARKS v. STATE"
Results 561 - 580
of 21,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2018, 5:20 am
We can now confirm the full agenda and part of the line-up, as follows:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “The fragile state of relations between service providers and brand owners: life after the UK Supreme Court decision in Cartier v Sky”Moderator: Eleonora Rosati(University of Southampton and JIPLP Co-Editor)Confirmed Panellists: Catherine Palmer(Legal Director at… [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
However, in Sky v SkyKick, the judge held that the EU Trade Mark Regulations (1994, 2009 and 2017) did not explicitly state that a lack of clarity and precision was a ground for invalidity of a registered trade mark, and the CJEU would have to provide guidance. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm
North American Olive Oil Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
But the court, in adopting an expansive reading of a recent Supreme Court precedent, cautioned that the news publication might have a strong defense on the likelihood of confusion analysis (Punchbowl, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
Sinclair Oil Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 3:01 am
Case C 445/12 P Rivella International AG v OHIM, Baskaya di Baskays Alim E.C. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:24 am
After the decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
Dial-A-Mattress I, 57 USPQ2d at 1812 (citing Van Dyne-Crotty, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
The CJEU’s ruling in DHL v ChronopostThe CJEU made it manifestly clear in its 2011 ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost [see previous Katpost here] that a Europe-wide injunction should only be granted in order to ensure that the proprietor can protect his trade mark, prohibiting only uses which affect or are liable to affect the functions of the trade mark. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
Evidence of third-party use of similar marks was “thin” (FocusVision Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
Deanna Stull Sandra Brinkman and Mark Brinkman v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 2:46 pm
’” [Id., at p. 9 (quoting Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:49 pm
Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
Marks DA 17-0686 2019 MT 76N Criminal – Other McGree v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
4 May 2018, 4:00 am
Yesterday the White House marked National Day of Prayer with a ceremony in the Rose Garden of the White House. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
Employees of a state or a political subdivision of a state may not be required to pay an agency-shop fee to a union unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay such a feeJanus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC v. [read post]
