Search for: "MARTIN V. STATE" Results 561 - 580 of 4,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2021, 11:34 pm by Ezra Rosser
Martin, as an entry point into a discussion on the constitutional limits of criminalizing acts that occur in public because, in the words of Justice White in his concurrence in Powell v. [read post]
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:50 am by Derek T. Muller
A dissental by Judge Daniel Collins (joined by Bea, Bennett, and Bress) from rehearing en banc did, however, earn this particular meta-critique by Judge Berzon (joined by Hurwitz):Even within the questionable genre of dissents from denial of rehearing en banc, see Martin v. [read post]
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
The appellate court affirmed, however, the grant of summary judgment with respect to publications occurring prior to March 2015 (Martin v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 20 May 2021 the BBC published a Report  by former Master of the Rolls and Supreme Court Justice, Lord Dyson into the circumstances of how BBC reporter Martin Bashir came to interview Princess Diana for the BBC Panorama in November 1995. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
That missionary role is especially evident in the context of European relations with states at the initial phases of development and with Marxist Leninist States. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm by admin
Webber also cited an article by NIOSH scientist Martin Harper, who stated the opinion, without evidentiary support that NIOSH did not believe, in 2008, that there was “sufficient evidence for a different toxicity for non-asbestiform amphibole particles that meet the morphological criteria for a fiber. [read post]
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]
Writing separately, Circuit Judge Rawlinson said she would have affirmed the district court’s decision (OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. [read post]