Search for: "MATTER OF K C H"
Results 561 - 580
of 622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The Court thus cloaks in the rhetoric of volition a policy in tension with constitutionally-pedigreed access to justice and venerable principles of federalism.This Article documents the rhetoric-reality gap and explores why it exists and why it matters. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
(American Express is a notable exception in that regard, as is, to some extent, Bank of America f/k/a FIA Card Services, N.A.). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
The Norges Bank also announced the exclusion of Evergy Inc and Washington H. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Task Complexity The theory of task complexity proposes that the use of uh and um increases along with the complexity of the subject matter the speaker is addressing. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
§ §341, 343(b), 343(c), 343(d), 343(e), 343(f), 343(g), 343(h), 343(i), 343(k), 343(q), or 343(r)) relating to food.Drug and device companies don't have that problem, which - as we explained in our prior post - is why the California Supreme Court had to jump through all the hoops it did to avoid preemption.So with this point in mind, we look at the defendants' certiorari petition in Albertsons/Farm Raised Salmon. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
”[20] OSHA in the 1991 Standard relied on its reasoning from the 1978 Occupational Exposure to Lead Final Standard (the “1978 Standard”) where it rejected biological testing of workers as a means of monitoring employer compliance with occupational lead exposure limits.[21] In the 1978 Standard, OSHA concluded that “[a]ttempting to compel workers to subject themselves to detailed medical examinations presents the possibility of clashes with legitimate privacy and religious… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
Prescription drugs are invaluable tools in the practice of medicine, used to treat numerous illnesses and diseases. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
”[4] The Supreme Court once reversed him for reading an “unwritten exception” into a law he didn’t like, because “[h]owever sensible” his dislike of it might have been, a “court’s task is to apply the text [of a statute], not to improve upon it. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[24] The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
It is the first of two contributions to the symposium posted today, along with this related post from Corbin K. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
C. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” (c) The Australian Press Council’s 2007 submission to the Minister for Telecommunication 23 April 2007 The APC suggested, albeit in two paragraphs, that a voluntary code of conduct for bloggers could be considered[8]. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
H. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:58 am
Hamre and Kathleen H. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Those elements motivate core differences in the Court’s interpretive debates over fundamental privileges versus promises, textualism versus purposivism, status quo-preserving originalism vs. rights-promoting pragmatism.[4] I aim to explore those elements with an eye to the plurality of opinions that emerge from shared legal texts, now that stare decisis is in question as a way to settle them and now that interpretations of history and tradition matter a lot toward the same end. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:36 am
Panelists include Jung H. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:03 pm
The coronavirus has spread to all 50 states, the District of Columbia and multiple territories, with case totals still increasing rapidly in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
The ideal defendant’s case might occur in several ways: similar biomarker evidence would point a finger at a purely genetic cause or at some other (perhaps voluntary or non-anthropogenic) exposure; or, a person exposed to a toxin known to cause the person's disease in susceptible people might have a gene that completely neutralized the toxic effect and also might lack a biomarker that is uniformly found in people whose disease was caused by exposure.Steve C. [read post]
