Search for: "MATTER OF R B" Results 561 - 580 of 14,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As far as the claim without the disclaimer is concerned, the Board is of the opinion – as was the ED – that it encompasses subject-matter that violates A 53(a) in connection with R 28(c) because the use of human embryos as a starting material in a method for obtaining embryonic stem cells that is to be used commercially, constitutes a “use … for industrial or commercial purposes” within the meaning of R 28(c) (see also the judgment of the… [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As a consequence, it also constitutes the “text intended for grant”, so that, if it contains more than 15 claims, claims fees fall due and have to be paid in application of R 71(6).In case (b), however, the ED has to deal with the filed amendments and may have to establish a new communication (Prüfungsbescheid) (R 71(5)). [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
Contents include:Martha Finnemore & Michelle Jurkovich, The Politics of Aspiration Øyvind Stiansen & Erik Voeten, Backlash and Judicial Restraint: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights Kelebogile Zvobgo, Wayne Sandholtz, & Suzie Mulesky, Reserving Rights: Explaining Human Rights Treaty Reservations Michael A Gavin, Global Club Goods and the Fragmented Global Financial Safety Net Yoram Z Haftel, Daniel F Wajner, & Dan Eran, The Short and Long(er) of It: The… [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:15 pm by Unknown
Journal articles:"Barriers and Facilitators to Care-seeking among Survivors of Gender-based Violence in the Dadaab Refugee Complex," Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 28, no. 1 (2020) [open access]"Matter of A-B- One Year Later: Winning Back Gender-based Asylum Through Litigation and Legislation," Santa Clara Journal of International Law, vol. 18, no. 1 (2020) [full-text]"Migration, Stress and the Challenges of Accessing… [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:04 am
At the end of trial, the court granted Danielle's motion for nonsuit, finding that section 7613(b) applied to the matter, precluding Jason from proving paternity under section 7611(d). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:44 am
In some regulatory matters involving spouses, it is quite clear that the underlying issue is one of miscommunication and misunderstanding; in other matters, however, it's simply about lying and thieving. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:12 am
It’s a complicated matter which I’m going to blog about in a series called The EGTRRA Restatement Series. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:45 pm by Brett Trout
First, patent examiners must now reference specifically outlined categories (see below) of subject matter that constitute “abstract ideas. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:17 pm by Patent Docs
§ 112(b), which reads: "The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention" (emphasis added). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:43 pm by Patent Docs
§ 271(e)(2) was sufficient to confer subject-matter jurisdiction on a federal district court regardless of the merits of the claim, and therefore dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1) is inappropriate in such circumstances. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:35 pm by Patent Docs
Netflix moved to dismiss the case on the pleadings under Rule 12(b)(6), asserting that the claims did not meet the subject matter eligibility requirements of 35 U.S.C. [read post]