Search for: "MATTER OF W C"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2021, 8:52 am
Unlike the Court of Appeal of Kraków in the 2016 case, the Court of Appeal of Warsaw had doubts as to its international jurisdiction based on Article 7(2) Brussels Ia. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:43 pm
It may well be that a different image would have been just as good as the infringed image, but the fact of the matter is that the infringing image was the one used. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 10:53 am
In Matter of W-G-R- and Matter of M-E-V-G-, The Board held that an applicant seeking asylum based on his or her membership in a “particular social group” must establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially distinct within the society in question. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm
No consensus on applying IP principles to those two categories.Why does this matter? [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
The Supreme Court also explained that[w]e review findings made in lawyer discipline cases under a clearly erroneous standard. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
However, in an as yet unpublished July, 2015 decision in the matter of R C v R W, decided by the Honorable L.R. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
” However, while the current version of Rule 8-503 requires the appellant to file its brief “[w]ithin 40 days after the clerk sends notice of the filing of the record,” the tweak to Rule 8-412(c) would make that deadline sometime after 40 days: “Unless otherwise ordered by the appellate court, the date by which the appellant’s brief must be filed shall be no earlier than 40 days after the date the Clerk sends the notice” (emphasis added). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
” However, while the current version of Rule 8-503 requires the appellant to file its brief “[w]ithin 40 days after the clerk sends notice of the filing of the record,” the tweak to Rule 8-412(c) would make that deadline sometime after 40 days: “Unless otherwise ordered by the appellate court, the date by which the appellant’s brief must be filed shall be no earlier than 40 days after the date the Clerk sends the notice” (emphasis added). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 11:40 am
Simek and Michael C. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:08 am
But it’s narrow protection b/c there are no choices. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
It matters b/c it’s censorship. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
If it’s b/c they go too close to other areas like patent, then alternatives might matter. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 1:54 pm
James W. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm
Thingness of property matters b/c by defining a thing and marking it w/rough exclusion signals we create relatively clear signals about what you can and can’t do with it. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:06 pm
On November 15, 2010, ALJ Carl C. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
Less productive even than confusion b/c of diversity of interpretations. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:21 am
P. 26(b)(2)(C), but does mandate consideration of many of the same factors. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 2:08 am
C. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:07 am
Gibbons P.C. is pleased to announce that firm Directors Frederick W. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:07 am
Gibbons P.C. is pleased to announce that firm Directors Frederick W. [read post]
