Search for: "MERCK"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2022, 9:15 am
The first set, between Merck and the PBGs, entitled participating PBG members to discounts if they purchased a threshold quantity of vaccines from Merck. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:15 am
The first set, between Merck and the PBGs, entitled participating PBG members to discounts if they purchased a threshold quantity of vaccines from Merck. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:15 am
The first set, between Merck and the PBGs, entitled participating PBG members to discounts if they purchased a threshold quantity of vaccines from Merck. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
To the extent Merck v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Supreme Court April 27 ruled unanimously that shareholders in Merck & Co. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 1:42 am
While Tesoriero calls Merck's settlement decision "somewhat surprising" in light of its courtroom wins, and puts details of Merck's defense costs at the end of her relatively brief story, Berenson portrays the plaintiffs, not Merck, as the party that's capitulating and reminds readers that Merck's exposure to damages once was considered much higher. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 6:13 am
-based Merck pulled Vioxx from the market in September 2004 after its own research showed the drug doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 pm
Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 7:12 pm
Divided three-judge Third Circuit panel reinstates class action securities fraud complaint against Merck & Co alleging that the company misrepresented the safety profile and commercial viability of Vioxx: You can access today's ruling of the U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
A federal judge has ordered a third trial in a lawsuit by a woman who blamed Merck & Co.'s painkiller Vioxx for the heart attack that killed her husband. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:00 pm
In this products liability claim, the court dismissed an appeal made by the Merck Co., and a jury agreed that Merck and Co. didn’t warn John McDarby about Vioxx’s heart risks. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 11:23 am
Sessner's attorneys reiterated these several contentions, which they had constantly asserted throughout the trial: Merck never acknowledged that Fosamax has caused ONJ -- not a single case -- despite all the thousands of adverse event reports (AERs) submitted by doctors; To find for Merck you, i.e., the jury, must disagree not only with Mrs. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 12:28 pm
But reporter Bob Grant established that this "journal" was, in fact, paid for by Merck: Elsevier acknowledged that Merck had sponsored the publication, but did not disclose the amount the drug company paid. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:52 am
Merck is facing more than 850 lawsuits over Fosamax. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:25 pm
False marking based on Merck's marking of its Claritin-D and Dr. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:35 pm
In Merck & Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:46 am
Merck & Company, Inc., 2008 WL 5157705 (9th Cir. 2008). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm
At least 900 lawsuits have been filed against pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 7:33 am
Merck & Co., Inc., No. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:44 pm
Merck periodically updated the drug's labels to include warnings for tremors, depression and anxiety. [read post]
