Search for: "MONEY v. STATE"
Results 561 - 580
of 22,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2006, 5:24 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 10:08 pm
In US v Mazza-Alaluf, 2008 US Dist Lexis 8227, (S.D. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:31 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court has radically altered the legal landscape for politics with the 5-4 decision in the case Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 9:23 pm
Next, the First agrees with the parties that in light of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:34 pm
In a recent case, Cohen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 1:39 pm
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Adam Teicholz, Alana Semuels, Andrew Cohen, Andrew Tangel, Christopher Michaud, Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, Federal Government, Gay, Gay Marriage, Lesbians, LGBT, Money, Quote of the Day, SCOTUS, Supreme Court, Tax, Tax Law, Taxes, United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
My money says the NRA will win this one. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:11 am
See Aramark Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 12:52 pm
In Jacobsen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:55 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
In a 7-2 decision, the Court held that Machinist preemption bars California from requiring that contractors receiving money from the state not spend that money on anti-union activities. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
For example, the decision states that a district court does not have the power to suspend a sentence, citing United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
In Guilmette v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
United States (06-1456), on whether the federal money laundering statute requires an attempt to create the appearance of legitimate wealth, and in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:32 pm
Rather than recite the facts of this extremely interesting case, I'll merely cut-and-paste the money quote from Judge Wardlaw's majority opinion (to which Judge Pregerson dissents):"Once again, an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of California overstepped the boundaries of permissible questioning and argument. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:07 pm
Timbs v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
The court will hear Timbs v. [read post]
