Search for: "Mark Strong"
Results 561 - 580
of 10,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2017, 1:25 am
To expand the discussion a bit further, even if Chinese people would have known the existence of this person, it would be farfetched to say that “Trump” the mark in question had created sufficient strong and stable mental association with Donald Trump the American businessman. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 2:58 am
CENTO PER CENTO is conceptually strong as a trademark. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm
© Mark Pearson 2012 This post originally appeared on the Journlaw blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 9:13 am
The post BC Court Ruling Offers Strong Defence of Internet Keyword Advertising appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:45 pm
As the name suggests, the Charbucks Blends are made from strong, dark-roast coffee beans. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
Four months have passed since the House of Representatives found former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in contempt and asked the Department of Justice to bring his case before a grand jury. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
Too strong, according to some. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
The Board did find, however, that the mark is "fairly strong" and entitled to a "concomitant broad scope of protection. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 2:15 am
"Because the word "Air" has suggestive significance and the word "Tech" is also suggestive ("of the level of technology incorporated into Opposer's suspension and cushioning components"), opposer's mark is not a strong one. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:15 am
The Board concluded that the cited mark falls on the lower end of the "spectrum from very strong to very weak. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:08 am
This being so, since BSKF's mark didn't have any kanji, the two marks were not similar -- and that was an end to the matter.The IPKat thinks the result is correct and suspects that, within the world of British Shorinji Kempo practitioners, where loyalties are strong and passions run high, few people will be in any doubt as to which organisation is which. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:05 am
In re Wahl, Serial No. 85485701 (November 20, 2013) [not precedential].The Board, not surprisingly, found the minor visual and aural dissimilarities in the marks to be outweighed by their strong similarities as to connotation and overall commercial impression.As to the goods, applicant Wahl feebly argued that her goods comprise "half butterfly, half fairy dolls," and may include "a cocoon for the doll to live in, as well as removable butterfly wings." [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 9:30 am
As to the marks, the Board found that "[b]ecause the marks share the surname 'Edelman,' which is the only element in the registered mark and is a clearly recognizable and prominent element in applicant's mark, ... there are strong similarities between the marks in terms of appearance, sound, meaning and commercial impression. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
Consequently, the holder of an earlier right may apply to invalidate a trade mark, unless the latter was filed in good faith or was used as a trade mark for more than five years (Articles L. 711-1 - L. 711-4 IPC) — these being the national provisions relied upon in this case. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 2:07 am
IN THE LONDON TIMES: Strong praise for Kathleen Parker's Save the Males. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Ambition has never been Andy's strong point - he prefers to take it easy. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 1:58 pm
Ambition has never been Andy’s strong point – he prefers to take it […] [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:08 am
The court appointed attorney Mark J. [read post]
5 May 2023, 3:39 am
" Applicant argued that the marks, although identical, have different connotations, since the cited mark "conveys a strong commercial impression of a restaurant focused primarily on ‘chicken’ entrees made from ‘scratch. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:53 am
There was no evidence of third-party use of SCOOPER BOWL or similar marks, and so the Board found the SCOOPER BOWL mark to be "somewhat strong commercially" and entitled to "a slightly broader scope of protection on the spectrum of 'very strong to very weak.'"Turning to the marks, the Board noted that when the services are identical-in-part, a lesser degree of similarity between the marks is required to support a… [read post]
