Search for: "Mark v. Wish"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
Another expected benefit of these changes is to "increase examiner morale leading to reduced attrition" (slide 5--high examiner turnover is currently one of the biggest problems at the USPTO).Although this initial proposal may ultimately be subject to revision, I give Kappos and his task force high marks in crafting a proposal that appears likely to noticeably advance the goals of promoting efficiency and fairness in patent examination; and I applaud their transparency and… [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
See AB Svenska Spel v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:09 am
Check out this order, Motamedi v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
See Arizona v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:24 am
The headline is catchy — only if you are following the issue close enough to know the name of the case is Boring v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
McHugh and (for example) Mark Obbie of Slate spoke with me before writing about my views. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:34 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
In Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:39 am
A student who wishes to acquire commercial awareness would find the study of copyright law extremely useful for his or her professional development. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:27 am
" David Beasley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:05 am
The Cariou v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Sarmiento and Sharpston view Zambrano (C-34/09, EU:C:2011:124), which caused a stir because of the substance of rights test, as a “high-water mark” in the CJEU’s jurisprudence. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:43 am
In the judicial review case of R (Calver) v Adjudication Panel for Wales and another, for example, Bateson J pointed out that the ‘fact-sensitive approach means that there is no rigid typology’ for determining freedom of expression in the public interest [57]. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm
S. 3, 20 (1997); alterations and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:03 pm
VALENCIA, Petitioner, v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
(known as Abitron v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm
Arguing for Mark A. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:32 am
Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:13 am
Compare, Grand Canyon West Ranch LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Having recently marked the forty-fifth anniversary of the Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
