Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 561 - 580
of 14,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2007, 10:01 pm
We've previously reported on this case and the underlying Hollins v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:03 am
But when the issue is “how to interpret the marks or holes or scratches on an inanimate object, a piece of cardboard or paper,” in this context it is possible to adopt more “specific rules designed to ensure uniform treatment. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:26 am
" Hunt Control Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:22 am
Here's what Kimberley writes: Fanatics about trade mark infringement, cancellation and honest concurrent use in Australiaby Kimberley EvansIn FanFirm Pty Limited v Fanatics, LLC [2024] FCA 764, Justice Rofe of the Federal Court of Australia considered a number of interrelated trade mark issues, including trade mark infringement, honest concurrent use defences, defences to infringement based on registered trade mark rights, and what happens when the… [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
§1064(3)).With arbitrary or fanciful marks, the word used as trade mark has its own meaning and it therefore has its own place in language (the Ninth Cirucit in this case used the example of the trade mark IVORY, which is a trade mark for soap but also is the material of the tusks of elephants Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:23 am
Herein, it appears, lies the crux of the present referral; where a trade mark system enables a monopoly for five years before the registration of a trade mark may be contested, how may the interests of traders seeking access to the market be balanced against those seeking to unduly block said entry? [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:55 am
How therefore, could the making of such an Order this time be justified? [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
Here's what Darren writes:Retromark Volume VIII: the last six months in trade marks by Darren Meale As awful as this year has been, I’m constantly reminding myself how lucky us lawyers are. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:06 am
This year's paper was arguably made even more challenging by the introduction on the syllabus for the first time of the principles of the doctrine of equivalents as established by Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Eli Lilly (which even UK judges are still working out how to apply...). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:01 am
’” That’s not how we read the district court’s decision. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:09 pm
Footnote 5 of Smith v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
The plaintiff is represented by Mark Geragos, and the Ninth Circuit opinion is written by Judge Reinhardt.What's your guess as to how the case comes out? [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 pm
" (How that phrase must have made Scalia's skin crawl!) [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 5:16 am
The Republic of Tea, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Under United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
One Wholesaler v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 10:00 am
Search Our Site The post Feltington v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:31 am
" Trans World International, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 5:55 am
Diesel S.p.A. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Boston Scientific Corp. and Asthmatx, Inc. v. [read post]
