Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2025, 6:36 am
"[E]ven if United States consumers engaged with these ads, that would not prove Applicant’s intent to offer alcoholic beverages under the CUADRA mark in the United States on March 20, 2020 when the application was filed. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
It tacked on counts for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and dilution, all of which claims were dismissed because the defendant does not currently use the VAGISAN mark in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
We view recent posts by Mark Graber and others in a similar fashion. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:46 pm
General Cable Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 1:44 pm
According to Han Beauty Inc v Alberto-Culver Co., 236 F.3d 1333, (Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
” (Slip Op. at 18) (citing United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:52 am
In-N-Out Burgers v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2025, 2:34 am
DuPont DeNemours Co., 476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973), weighed in favor of a likelihood of confusion (Dollar Financial Group, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:20 am
[The Board granted a petition to cancel five registrations for the marks EDGE, THE EDGE, GAMER'S EDGE, and CUTTING EDGE for video games, printed matter, and related goods and services, in view of a final judgment entered by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Edge Games, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 4:23 pm
Holmes v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:17 am
Complainant owns rights to the 123INKJETS mark, which is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) (Reg. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 6:06 pm
The Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:49 pm
Dunoff & Mark A. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:48 am
In discharging the duties of his office in this case, the Assistant United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas missed the mark. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we celebrate the wonder of human existence and renew our resolve to build a culture of life where every person of every age is protected, valued, and cherished.This month, we mark nearly 50 years since the United States Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
