Search for: "Martin v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm
The following blog post got me to thinking that a legal citation lesson for non-attorneys might be a challenge worth attempting, though I surely won’t get it right the first time.3 Geeks and a Law Blog: Bloomberg Law Gets Cited By A New Jersey Court… A First for “___ BL ___” (citing to United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:17 am
The ban was called the “Feres Doctrine,” referencing the Supreme Court of the United States decision in Feres v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:51 pm
He represented the FDIC as Receiver of United States National Bank in San Diego, California, between 1973 and 1983. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:51 pm
He represented the FDIC as Receiver of United States National Bank in San Diego, California, between 1973 and 1983. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:19 pm
Martin, 796 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2015), which rejected the application of the “government benefits” provision in such cases; and a Third Circuit decision, U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:29 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 5:38 pm
See also Cooper v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:55 pm
City of Boise (9th Cir. 2019) 920 F.3d 584 (“Martin”) and Johnson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 9:47 am
Bass-v-COTR-Complaint [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
United States, 528 U.S. 49, 120 S.Ct. 474 (1999). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:24 am
Justice Theis asked counsel what the Court should do with Martin v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 3:09 pm
Martin and Cliatt filed a lawsuit in federal court in Georgia against (as relevant here) the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:52 pm
Jordan had, on nine separate occasions, used a counterfeit badge and his United States Marshal credentials to pose as an on-duty U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:28 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 12. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 6:27 am
"Ortloff in turn relied solely on Martin v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
Q: Are social media companies “state actors”? [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:15 am
We therefore vacate the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Spatt, J.) [read post]
