Search for: "Matter of Barnette"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,005
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
"] Randy Barnett and I have written a new essay, titled Coping With a Court One Disagrees With. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Barnett v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 7:15 am
Update: Randy Barnett at Volokh, just wee bit late to the party, agrees. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:47 am
I'm not sure that gibes with what the average American would think on this -- they likely would object to the forced purchase, no matter what governmental body was doing it. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm
“The court has long said that it doesn't matter what label Congress affixes to an exaction,” Siegel wrote Thursday in an NPR blog. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Message boards are a different matter. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:31 pm
Nobody resents getting your first call If you don't ask, you won't get Barry Barnett Happy Halloween! [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
Scholars such as Randy Barnett, Keith Whittington, and Jack Balkin have offered thoughtful proposals for how judges should handle the enterprise of constitutional construction. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:19 pm
Professor Emily Hammond illustrates why getting deference to agency expertise correct matters by describing a richer, more nuanced understanding of agency expertise. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:29 pm
Nestlehutt is the final word in Georgia cases on the matter, unless the state Supreme Court overturns this decision in the future. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:27 pm
Barry Barnett Enjoy our free feed. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 5:05 am
They do acknowledge that methane is also naturally released by the decay of organic matter and wetlands. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:14 pm
Just as a matter of precedent, that doesn’t seem to me consistent with Wickard v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
The Cato Institute has filed an amicus brief in support of EPIC, which authors Jim Harper and Randy Barnett discuss at Cato’s blog. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:44 am
Gordon’s conceptual point is that Barnett’s argument is at base still all about authors: all the arguments about finding the next great American novel et cetera hinge on the role of the individual creator awaiting discovery and subsidy. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Conran (Ret.) deserves the Medal of Honor for selfless heroism in saving two helicopter crews and 46 combat troops in a secret mission 55 years ago. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/barry-barnett-8313014_colonel-philip-j-conran-ret-deserves-activity-7201411019703767041-ampa? [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 9:45 pm
Much of the structure of the 1993 Rules remains intact, but they have been thoroughly revised and, thanks, to Barnett, rendered in clear English. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 11:43 pm
” Previous representations of the criminal justice system missed the mark, according to Professor Barnett, “That is, until The Wire. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
I can’t believe that this is the hill that Ed Whelan and Greg Weiner really want to fight on, but I am prepared to defend the high ground: the original meaning of the “judicial power” included the power to declare laws “null and void” and, as a co-equal branch of government, the concurrence of the judiciary on the constitutionality of a law is needed when the law is properly challenged by a member of We the People. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Of course, it isn't the particular terminology that matters, but the substance of the distinction is not something that legal theorists can do without. [read post]
