Search for: "Matter of Barry V." Results 561 - 580 of 660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
And, yet, Barry still loses on the motion to dismiss. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:28 pm
If re-interpretation is on the cards, then I'm a bit surprised that there's only a three-judge bench hearing this matter, as I thought the VCA's tradition was to only overrule itself with a five-judge bench. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 11:05 am
Co., 88 NY2d at 215; see Sullivan v Barry Scott Agency, Inc., 23 AD3d at 890, Sochinski v Bankers & Shippers Ins. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:59 pm
NO-FAULT - SPECIAL PROCEEDING TO VACATE MASTER ARBITRATION AWARD - INTEREST - TOLLING - ACCRUALCanarsie Medical Health, P.C. a/a/o Ricky Barry v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 6:35 am
Second, Neal Devins argued that by the 1992 decision in Casey v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office)   Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46)   Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango)   Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 2:09 pm
The allegations of negligence in the complaint implied an unintentional or unexpected event which potentially gives rise to a covered claim as against Filer (see Barry v Romanosky, 147 AD2d 605). [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 2:19 pm
Complaint in Hasbro v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 8:18 pm
If you're a Biglaw associate, you probably know that feeling when all of your matters heat up at once. [read post]
24 May 2008, 6:35 am
  On questions of federalism and the Commerce Clause, a good deal of brush must be cleared to get to the heart of the matter. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:25 pm
It is not often that the Second Circuit reverses a drug conspiracy on insufficiency grounds, but it did so in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 12:47 pm
I participated in a podcast earlier today with Barry Dahl, who is the CIO at Lake Superior College in Duluth, MN about some of the issues in the pending Blackboard v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
Moreover, the Board stated that Oil Capitol addressed matters presented in compliance proceedings and that there has not yet been a compliance proceeding in McBurney. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:10 am
(Barry Barnett @ Blawgletter - 2/22/08)No recourse for the Injured (New York Times editorial 2/22/08)Supreme Court chips away right to sue (Newsday editorial 2/22/08)A Matter of Trust? [read post]