Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 561 - 580 of 4,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm by PaulKostro
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The subject-matter of claim 1 is not restricted to a specific method of applying the vital dye. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 10:27 am by PaulKostro
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am by Oliver G. Randl
The recent referral to the Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA) pending as G 1/10 has drawn some attention to the difficulties that may arise when the Examining Division (ED) acts under R 140 during opposition proceedings. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The EBA answered the referred questions in its decision G 1/08. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:41 am
Applying the Mayo test to claim 1 of the Morse patent may also result in the claimed subject matter being found to be directed to patent ineligible subject matter. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:41 am
Applying the Mayo test to claim 1 of the Morse patent may also result in the claimed subject matter being found to be directed to patent ineligible subject matter. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
In this matter the TTC has not indicated what its availability is to commence these arbitration proceedings. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:30 am by Broc Romanek
Creating a non-exclusive safe harbor under which a person will be deemed to have received the securities under an employee compensation plan if the person received them under a compensatory benefit plan in transactions that met the conditions of Securities Act Rule 701(c). [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
UKUO counterclaimed under Article 7(1)(b), (c), (d) and (g) of the same Regulations seeking to invalidate the trade mark.Judge Hacon, after dealing with the relevant case law, initially dealt with the claim of invalidity under Article 7(c) (which included subsection b as well). [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 12:19 pm
Ct. 2954 (2007) (dictum; police affiants cannot withhold negative history casting doubt upon a dog's reliability).FN5 See Grasso & McEvoy, Suppression Matters Under Massachusetts Law § 10-6[c][l][i] (2008-2009 ed.) [read post]