Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado" Results 561 - 580 of 1,817
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
Appellant is also admitted to practice in federal court in the District of Colorado, the District of Alaska, the Southern and Western Districts of New York, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:55 pm by Lyle Denniston
  This move, the Circuit Court declared, was closely similar to what the state of Colorado had done in taking away existing laws protecting homosexuals against discrimination in that state, after having previously assured such protection – a reversal that the Supreme Court struck down in its 1996 decision in Romer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Gary Hicks: On May 20, 2019, the plaintiff filed a remonstrance with the Secretary of State, the Governor, and the clerks of the House of Representatives and the Senate. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 7:37 am by Kate Howard
Florida 16-6250 Issues: (1) Whether a special jury instruction as to Section 790.162, Florida Statutes, that an accused may be convicted of that offense with the “stated intent” to do bodily harm to any person or damage to the property of any person, amounts to an unconstitutional diminishment of the required criminal mens rea or scienter under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Elonis v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:35 am by Amy Howe
She noted that since the court of appeals issued its decision, the Supreme Court in Counterman v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At Keen News Service, Lisa Keen notes that a similar clash between religious beliefs and anti-discrimination law, involving a florist from Washington State, will likely make a return trip to the Supreme Court, after the justices “said last year that the state court should reconsider its decision ‘in light of’ the Supreme Court’s decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:45 pm by Scott Bomboy
'” On June 26, 2013, a divided Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, James Gottry maintains that “[t]he Supreme Court’s decision simply clarifies that the government may not show hostility toward people of faith. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 11:49 am by Holland & Hart
Impact of Decision It is unclear whether this case will be appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
But as the dissent points out, far more relevant is the Supreme Court's summary dismissal of the appeal in Baker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:54 am by Cecere Santana, P.A.
More Blog Posts: State Supreme Court Rules for Defendant in Boating Accident Case, Cecere Santana Injury Lawyers Blog, published July 21, 2016. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 12:23 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The case may pose a test of the continuing validity of a major Supreme Court precedent on Congress and treaty enforcement laws: the 1920 decision in Missouri v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Supreme Court takes the bench in Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:09 am by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in a divided 2-1 decision, incorrectly narrowed qualified immunity and failed to faithfully apply the Supreme Court’s precedents when it held that officers clearly lacked reasonable suspicion for the brief detention of a driver after a valid traffic stop until a drug detection dog arrived and alerted to the driver’s car; and (2) whether the 10th Circuit erred by doing precisely what the Supreme Court… [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:49 am by Grant Sullivan
Sullivan is an assistant solicitor general with the Colorado Attorney General’s office, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of nine states in support of respondents in Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
Lobato, 187 Colo. 285, 289–90, 530 P.2d 493, 496 (Colorado Supreme Court 1975); see People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:59 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
Importantly, Colorado state law has a provision that states that uninsured motorist coverage may not be set off by an award from any other coverage, but the trial court interpreted that language to allow the setoff in the plaintiff’s case. [read post]