Search for: "Mays v. Parker" Results 561 - 580 of 1,371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2016, 4:25 pm by Jeff Gamso
Heller in which he wrote the majority opinion and Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi is a must-read for anyone involved in contract law. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am by Jeremy Saland
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Here’s how they work together:Comment b following §908 further states that “[r]eckless indifference to the rights of others and conscious action in deliberate disregard of them (see §500) may provide the necessary state of mind to justify punitive damages. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:49 pm by RegBlog
The authors suggested that higher use of antidepressants may mirror changing societal perspectives on depression. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The LSE Media Policy Project Blog argues that this news may be good news for travellers with mobile phones, but argues that pressing issues remain on the future of net neutrality in Europe. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 1:50 pm by Dale Carpenter
(Much of the history I recount here  comes from Chapter 3 of my book, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
Parker — Whether Congress in 1882 had reduced the size of a reservation for the Om [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may not be… [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 10:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
Parker Ave., L.P. v City of Philadelphia, 2015 WL 4597601(Pa Commw Ct 7/30/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/1162CD14_7-30-15.pdf? [read post]