Search for: "Mays v. United States of America" Results 561 - 580 of 5,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2024, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
The habitual-residence provision of the Illinois Allocation Judgment states that “[t]he ‘Habitual Residence’ of the minor child is the United States of America, specifically the County of Cook, State of Illinois, United States of America. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Edward B. Foley
Gore itself: “Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:32 am by Amanda Rice
Mensing and Talk America, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 6:04 am by Florian Mueller
It is in the national economic (and also the national security) interest of the United States to encourage manufacturing companies to invest. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:38 pm by William H. Holmes
From our colleagues Beverly Pearman and Jeremy Sacks: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The recent case of Canada (United States of America) v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 5:01 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
(Yamaha-America), its wholly owned domestic subsidiary and exclusive importer and distributor in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:13 am
As to Section 1746, an unsworn declaration must be "substantially in the following form:"I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:10 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Postal Service, No. 17-1594 (Can a US Gov’t entity petition for AIA review?) [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:27 pm by Rick
The single biggest destructive force in the United States of America has been the so-called “War on Drugs. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm by Jo Dale Carothers
Although arguably foreshadowed, some may be surprised to learn that a party with the right to challenge the validity of a patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) may not have the right to appeal an unfavorable decision. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:54 am by Patti Spencer
On May 7, 2012 the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an opinion in the case of Healthcare Retirement Corporation of America v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The Case of the Day is Agudas Chasidei Chabad of the United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]